Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #104946

Re: Readability counts, was Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement.

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Readability counts, was Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement.
Date Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:34:48 +0100
Organization None
Lines 93
Message-ID <mailman.164.1458063313.12893.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <fcd34352-44d2-4912-b76c-7b3860c4fe1e@googlegroups.com> <b5cae758-d246-4fdb-b5ce-0961d9d409c6@googlegroups.com> <mailman.156.1458030609.12893.python-list@python.org> <18e54ae4-0471-4c3f-842c-da67eedeff02@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7Bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de FGHLXE7BdqsY6Ex+NgfuTA5LfxwdWzKK4QvOtQidbLoA==
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'modify': 0.04; 'expressions': 0.07; 'familiarity': 0.07; 'assumed': 0.09; 'beginners': 0.09; 'contexts': 0.09; 'expression:': 0.09; 'likewise': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'recommends': 0.09; 'statements': 0.09; 'bug': 0.10; 'url:blog': 0.10; 'python': 0.10; '"this': 0.13; 'value.': 0.15; "'this": 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'attributes:': 0.16; 'basic.': 0.16; 'convey': 0.16; 'crammed': 0.16; 'grasp': 0.16; 'guilty': 0.16; 'partly': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'syntactic': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'example.': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; 'versions': 0.20; 'fix': 0.21; '(the': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'beauty': 0.22; 'minor': 0.22; 'referring': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'code.': 0.23; '(or': 0.23; '(like': 0.23; '(you': 0.23; "python's": 0.23; 'second': 0.24; 'thus': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'distribute': 0.27; 'helpful': 0.27; 'function': 0.28; 'clever': 0.29; 'prints': 0.29; 'print': 0.30; '15,': 0.30; 'compared': 0.30; 'programmers': 0.30; 'probably': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'getting': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'usually': 0.33; 'point,': 0.33; 'charged': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'skip:i 20': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; 'basic': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'beyond': 0.37; 'wanted': 0.37; 'things': 0.38; 'difference': 0.38; 'version': 0.38; 'anything': 0.38; 'someone': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'rather': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'questions': 0.40; 'software': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.61; 'default': 0.61; 'eye': 0.61; 'impact': 0.61; 'yes': 0.62; 'course': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'march': 0.64; 'world': 0.64; 'between': 0.65; 'elsewhere': 0.66; 'readers': 0.66; 'cultural': 0.76; '"most': 0.84; 'not)': 0.84; 'otten': 0.84; 'subject:Sets': 0.84; 'terrible': 0.84; 'universally': 0.84; 'url:2016': 0.84; 'utc+5:30,': 0.84; 'subject:Lists': 0.91; 'serious': 0.97
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host p57bd9927.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
User-Agent KNode/4.13.3
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:104946

Show key headers only | View raw


Rustom Mody wrote:

> On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 2:00:25 PM UTC+5:30, Peter Otten wrote:
>> Rustom Mody wrote:
>> 
>> > Others have answered some parts
>> >>>> if x in x_list:
>> > ...     print("That is a fruit.")
>> > ... else:
>> > ...     print("That is not a fruit.")
>> > ...
>> > 
>> > However one can distribute the print out of the if; Thus
>> > 
>> >>>> "This is %s a fruit" % ("" if x in x_list else "not")
>> 
>> Which of the two versions will most readers grasp at first sight?
>> Which one is easier to modify so that it works for arbitrary attributes?
>> Which one is easier to internationalize?
> 
> I think you are saying that my (last) version is clever in a rather stupid
> sort of way. Yes?

Well, yes ;)

> Well if that is what someone recommends for serious programming then
> guilty as charged
> 
> But there is a world of difference between
> - What one SHOULD (or not) do
> - What one CAN do
> 
> The first is about serious|professional software engineering
> The second is about getting an education beyond basic to some more
> familiarity
> 
> I assumed that OP is in the noob stage and was welcome some learning.
> So what I wanted to convey is not so much that such expressions are nice
> to have in serious code. Rather that
> 1. Like algebra has laws so does programming
> 2. That these laws can be used to massage one program into another
> 3. That expressions (like %-format) can occur elsewhere than in prints

That (the % part) is a lesson for C programmers rather than newbies ;)

> 4. That prints are usually unnecessary (and an abomination)

They aren't. They are often misused by beginners when they occur where a 
function should return a value.
 
> Not that 3 and 4 come out so well as 1,2 in the above example.
> 
> However to answer your questions specifically.
> 
> Internationalization: Terrible
> Arbitrary attributes: not sure what you are referring to
> Readability: Very much like beauty -- in the eye of the beholder
> Some things are universally beautiful; some only in some cultural contexts
> Likewise readability
> 
> Partly people find if-expressions unreadable because they are not used to
> them.
> This is backward because expressions are as basic than statements  -- if
> anything more basic.

I think the problem is not that you prefer a programming paradigm that is 
not Python's default -- it's that you crammed too many ideas into one 
example. It's probably most helpful to concentrate on your main point, e. g.

(You can) Use an expression:

>>> x = "flying saucer"
>>> "This is a fruit" if x in x_list else "This is not a fruit"
'This is not a fruit'

> It is *symmetric*  Unfortunately understood as lopsided
> More such symmetries in this table:
> http://blog.languager.org/2016/01/primacy.html#expstat
> 
> Partly python if-expressions are unreadable because they are backward
> compared to if-statements. A minor syntactic nuisance but yes it does
> impact readability

Indeed. It's still better than

"This is %s a fruit" % (x in x_list and "" or "not")

The bug is intentional; the fix is of course

"This is %s a fruit" % (x in x_list and "most likely" or "probably not")

;)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. jj0gen0info@gmail.com - 2016-03-14 17:26 -0700
  Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 20:31 -0400
  Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:33 +1100
  Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 00:38 +0000
    Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. jj0gen0info@gmail.com - 2016-03-14 18:32 -0700
  Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. jj0gen0info@gmail.com - 2016-03-14 18:24 -0700
  Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-15 13:10 +1100
  Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 23:30 -0700
    Readability counts, was Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-15 09:29 +0100
      Re: Readability counts, was Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 04:08 -0700
        Re: Readability counts, was Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-03-15 18:34 +0100
          Re: Readability counts, was Re: Use of Lists, Tupples, or Sets in IF statement. Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 19:54 -0700

csiph-web