Re: Differences of "!=" operator behavior in python3 and python2 [ bug? ]

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.042
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.93; 'S': 0.02; 'operator': 0.03; 'method.': 0.07; 'subject:bug': 0.07; 'meaningful': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; '__ne__': 0.16; 'opposite': 0.16; 'reproduce': 0.16; 'subject:python3': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'joe': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'implemented': 0.33; 'older': 0.33; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'method': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'whatever': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; '12,': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'situation': 0.65; 'default': 0.69; 'special': 0.74; 'behavior': 0.77; 'returns.': 0.84; '2013': 0.98; 'mr.': 0.98
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=3JXOUuf+Xj3g2WUTt3NmlwOByZhZOsYTFmNSTrRH6Co=; b=HeeD4v2MWO7+ePiECjs5u4pFmoF0xD0xLFlFpA9B6y24mFqZHCbGV5kN4szKb6r5Sf vDXaZl4eZVFGCEHZNLlBB5Fu5JxssZly1L8EdZe86PcSf+hoJnjbjZUl17DFON/BbK9s lRJdBWrwfmFHmusgpgcpkvGHN2Fj3x8P612tMsilKk5yoaga4bAA5Cf1Sxt/zOFDTz8A +PpnVdTLkCgbGHY2aOjRx8ELOc86fWae4/s1EuslXcKBgvjvquRaUtH/jhU3M6e8OhwY K6420938mUOeAD9C4kmjfc7H7tu5b7aPea2KKKMky/P6huk7rel9vF20JZ3xF8xbRnbD 5XEA==
X-Received	by 10.66.250.230 with SMTP id zf6mr27786677pac.153.1368402057961; Sun, 12 May 2013 16:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<CAJxoosfPri76e+Zp802a3Ve5d9aY5Mrav0VLwU64bxJt1bZDag@mail.gmail.com>
References	<CAJxoosfPri76e+Zp802a3Ve5d9aY5Mrav0VLwU64bxJt1bZDag@mail.gmail.com>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	Sun, 12 May 2013 17:40:17 -0600
Subject	Re: Differences of "!=" operator behavior in python3 and python2 [ bug? ]
To	Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1606.1368402067.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	10
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1368402067 news.xs4all.nl 15923 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60713
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:45213

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Mr. Joe <titanix88@gmail.com> wrote:
> I seem to stumble upon a situation where "!=" operator misbehaves in
> python2.x. Not sure if it's my misunderstanding or a bug in python
> implementation. Here's a demo code to reproduce the behavior -

The != operator is implemented by the __ne__ special method.  In
Python 3, the default implementation of __ne__ is to call __eq__ and
return the opposite of whatever it returns.  In Python 2, __ne__ calls
the older __cmp__ method instead, which is no longer meaningful in
Python 3.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Differences of "!=" operator behavior in python3 and python2 [ bug? ] Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 17:40 -0600
  Re: Differences of "!=" operator behavior in python3 and python2 [ bug? ] Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-05-13 00:52 +0100

csiph-web