Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38597
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'syntax': 0.03; 'essentially': 0.04; 'explicitly': 0.04; 'method.': 0.05; 'line:': 0.07; 'reason,': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'def': 0.10; 'thread': 0.11; 'modification': 0.15; 'bit.': 0.16; 'cleanly': 0.16; 'expression.': 0.16; 'in-place': 0.16; 'iteration': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'iterator,': 0.16; 'iterators': 0.16; 'operation.': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'sequence:': 0.16; 'substituted': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'handles': 0.18; 'implicit': 0.22; 'object.': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'looks': 0.26; 'skip:" 20': 0.26; 'loop,': 0.29; 'oop': 0.29; 'proposing': 0.29; 'returned': 0.30; 'could': 0.32; 'handle': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'or,': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'being': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'list,': 0.39; 'more': 0.63; 'behavior': 0.64; 'taking': 0.65; '2013': 0.84; 'idiom': 0.84; 'premise': 0.84; 'tem': 0.84 |
| X-Received | by 10.49.60.40 with SMTP id e8mr783024qer.40.1360521914182; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:45:14 -0800 (PST) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Date | Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:45:13 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <mailman.1577.1360485575.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.196.111.103; posting-account=h3aEwQoAAACiuqX-oR3gvCVFm8lLHoWj |
| References | <680e50a4-6569-49cf-b369-0be450545d50@googlegroups.com> <5115c455$0$6574$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <d405822d-2252-4a85-8ab2-38ca88963d91@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1577.1360485575.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| X-Google-IP | 70.196.111.103 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Subject | Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty |
| From | Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> |
| To | comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1597.1360522696.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 43 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1360522696 news.xs4all.nl 6886 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41733 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:38597 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 2:39:21 AM UTC-6, Terry Reedy wrote: > While it is true that sorted(iterable) is essentially > > def sorted(iterable): > tem = list(iterable) > tem.sort > return tem > > the body is not an expression and cannot be substituted in an > expression. Yes but the body can be compressed to this single line: "list(iterable).sort()" > Reversed(iterable) is more complicated because it returns an iterator, > not a list, and looks for a class-specific __reversed__ method. > [...] Well if you're taking the position that iterators are difficult to create i say you are exaggerating a bit. Using the for loop: py> for LOCALVAR in SEQUENCE: ... do_something we can get the iterator for free. If however you want to control the iteration /without/ being locked into a loop, you can explicitly call: py> iter(seq) Or, if you prefer methods over global functions: py> seq.__iter__() Or, if python employed /true/ OOP paradigm: py> Iterator(seq) > Even if list mutation methods returned the list, which they do not and > for good reason, I am not proposing that in-place modification return the object. > reversed(it) is not the same as list(it).reverse(). So > that part of the premise of this thread is wrong. Well, it's not the same /now/, because of how Python handles this operation. The status quo is to encourage the implicit idiom over the explicit, however, this behavior could be optimized to cleanly handle /explicit/ syntax only.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 17:50 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-09 14:36 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 19:54 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 15:20 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:53 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-11 01:29 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-10 14:03 -0500
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-11 11:11 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 13:28 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-11 11:10 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 17:14 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 08:51 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 14:01 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-10 03:39 -0500
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 10:45 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-10 16:44 -0500
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-11 11:11 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 10:45 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-10 22:29 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 00:24 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-11 01:00 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-02-10 07:52 -0600
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 15:59 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-02-10 18:12 -0600
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 17:24 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 17:24 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-11 11:36 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-02-11 02:03 +0000
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:53 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 00:27 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:55 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 21:28 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 12:46 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 12:46 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:55 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 18:05 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-02-11 07:19 +0000
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 18:24 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-02-11 07:35 +0000
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Tim Chase <tim@thechases.com> - 2013-02-11 06:04 -0600
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 19:07 +0200
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 13:30 +0000
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 16:25 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-11 11:42 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 16:25 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 10:45 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-10 06:33 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 15:51 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 17:56 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 19:06 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Neil Hodgson <nhodgson@iinet.net.au> - 2013-02-10 20:53 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-10 22:30 +1100
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 10:55 -0800
Re: LangWart: Method congestion from mutate multiplicty Neil Hodgson <nhodgson@iinet.net.au> - 2013-02-11 08:57 +1100
csiph-web