Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #30438

Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list

Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date 2012-09-28 17:24 -0700
References <7cd170ac-bb14-4baa-93ea-530c569d3985@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1587.1348875975.27098.python-list@python.org> <b3564f31-f54c-4c00-a6e7-f497911c054a@googlegroups.com>
Subject Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list
From 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
Message-ID <mailman.1590.1348878303.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


dave於 2012年9月29日星期六UTC+8上午7時51分10秒寫道:
> more clearer, this is a more realistic use case:
> 
> 
> 
> ['awefawef', 'awefawfsf', 'awefsdf', 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzz', 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzz', 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzz']
> 
> 
> 
> and the quantity of ''zzzzzzzzzzzzzz'' would be dynamic.
> 
> 
> 
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 4:46:15 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> 
> > > a = ['a', 'b', x]
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > 
> 
> > > b = sorted(a)
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > 
> 
> > > What does x need to be to always be last on an ascending sort no matter what 'a' and 'b' are.... within reason... I am expecting 'a' and 'b' will be not longer than 10 char's long.... I tried making x = 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz' and believe it or not, this appears FIRST on the sort!!!
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > It appears last when I run the code.
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > To answer your question, though, if you want to force x to be last,
> 
> > 
> 
> > then I suggest removing it from the list and then appending it to the
> 
> > 
> 
> > end.

I am thinking if it is helpful to preprocess an arbitrary
list first into some set of unique  ordered elements before a sort. 

Anyway lists are passed by references  to functions in python. 

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

creating an artificial "last element" in sort list dave <davidreynon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 16:39 -0700
  Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 17:45 -0600
    Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list dave <davidreynon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 16:51 -0700
      Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-28 17:24 -0700
      Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-28 17:24 -0700
      Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 17:32 -0700
        Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 17:59 -0700
          Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 21:29 -0600
        Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 17:59 -0700
      Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2012-09-29 02:19 +0100
    Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list dave <davidreynon@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 16:51 -0700
  Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-28 18:42 -0700
  Re: creating an artificial "last element" in sort list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-29 02:05 +0000

csiph-web