Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #30413
| References | <CAO+9iGcDuQixYeLQus2RKzz-xGp=bui6SM4qMuX3yeqgCe4nAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmrS+LfwURCVjeAv13gr4ApSSc8AjWojsCy4eDEAhr95_g@mail.gmail.com> <5065B16B.5030405@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-29 02:25 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: REST code-golf: How concisely can you expose and consume services? |
| From | Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1572.1348849535.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> wrote: > (A little OT so my apologies up front) > > > On 12-09-28 12:39 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> I love the idea, even though I shan't be entering. Code golf is awesome >> fun! > > > Code golf is indeed awesome fun and I usually enjoy taking part as well. > However, I'm not a fan of code golf such as this, that uses a framework and > then defines a rule that you *can't* hack on the same framework. > > In the framework/external module spirit, I *could* write a module that does > *all* of this for me (in Pyramid, Django, web2py, etc) and then enter with a > simple method call in another module. > > Done. One liner. I win ;) > > I much prefer code golf that tests algorithmic/core language feature > knowledge. Of course, that's entirely only my opinion. > > -- > Demian Brecht > @demianbrecht > http://demianbrecht.github.com > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list Well I suppose I could lax that same requirement. I.e.: if you can get these decorators (also working with RBAC) in, for example: Django; then it still satisfied the rules :)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: REST code-golf: How concisely can you expose and consume services? Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-09-29 02:25 +1000
csiph-web