Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

References	<CAMjeLr_eJf1Aboz=2+oti4TOV=oejUYVo7K4zks+Ck4CSHaqpg@mail.gmail.com> <5167F327.3030803@nedbatchelder.com> <CAMjeLr8+pr12+0mN0SOrtg9ZTkNq=PiqxWyqB8CxpJ0BT=sxJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMjeLr9OSD4B-2NHNra=Acyj1h0g8VLOVwjFFm5c35TX+Vu5SA@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidn442aiADJwYSzQfAZsHf4RK=sdgt1C7dJHxsHeqiZzPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date	2013-05-10 03:47 +1000
Subject	Re: Message passing syntax for objects \| OOPv2
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1552.1368273954.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> All this irrelevant nonsense
> about Turing machines and lambda calculus that you've injected into
> the conversation though just reminds me of the "Einstein was wrong"
> cranks.

http://xkcd.com/1206/

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-10 03:47 +1000

csiph-web