Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38498
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.026 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'indexing': 0.07; 'blue': 0.09; 'dict': 0.09; 'minus': 0.09; 'oh,': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; "wouldn't": 0.11; 'sat,': 0.15; 'characters:': 0.16; 'folks,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'literals': 0.16; 'literals.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'feb': 0.19; 'python?': 0.20; 'minor': 0.22; '(you': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'idea': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'wrap': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; 'no,': 0.29; 'usually': 0.30; 'fri,': 0.30; 'stuff': 0.30; 'johnson': 0.32; 'choosing': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'mapping': 0.35; 'doing': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'wanted': 0.36; 'characters': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'uses': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'instead': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; 'stand': 0.61; 'between': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'car': 0.69; 'yourself': 0.77; '2013': 0.84; 'alike.': 0.84; 'dict.': 0.84; 'pike': 0.84; 'red.': 0.84; 'that)': 0.84; 'rick': 0.91; 'choice.': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uC4qJbEzpAtszaeWjvLbPEOLdkSQnJNnlw+YtHvJ9tE=; b=blJPNs/gtZkZoiBsgtUSB73h/aNVXnAOmCXb+8j5V6nJYe+1o6ClCEyR9T96IDdIHu ip92j2WZii/06DqvlbZ3kXftmJ9+/VbqZfhXdWitrLJMPakOj9+aOTCxBC+gXokR4tnB Eu7mY5ziXM4IxD6hYYNCz5fNtY810Bozlh6N/DfbkdNQp1+ENzesm3A9PHSjOfINv4SB YbNOFkY8bpL3CsaerBDS0K0h6munr58WXYMDudZp6MN07WcvPSVqY4B5ppSClkkXOF7D 3e62VX1N3ZAJSPHyMsFgWPvprMjYZNXaoGcAv0dQJK+NrMNF2WcBohxvGVlpTIUoHtWH RC6g== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.220.219.77 with SMTP id ht13mr9625185vcb.66.1360386061064; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:01:01 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <CALwzidm7vg3ucvgm=TzAjQyS8VBWY6ouK0himZ45mPpPL+e-UA@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <mailman.2132.1342341291.4697.python-list@python.org> <5002a1f9$0$29995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2141.1342369188.4697.python-list@python.org> <7b027612-a07e-40f9-8ad2-3e95c5440482@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2148.1342375350.4697.python-list@python.org> <bbc44546-ffb7-4ff9-bd43-3bfa068df75f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2154.1342389192.4697.python-list@python.org> <86872ad2-fda0-403b-9f18-d1cb18e41860@t32g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmov--b_s5e=OYsWWV8w6byj5a+28NNu-vRWGV8mr8w5cg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2159.1342404957.4697.python-list@python.org> <50039290$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2197.1342498752.4697.python-list@python.org> <9309333c-13a0-464c-bd94-9c682363b8c9@googlegroups.com> <511516db$0$29969$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <ee71b775-b527-4bb3-a080-12aad962b0ba@googlegroups.com> <62c3e7bb-d023-43b4-b759-f424707fd346@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1521.1360368357.2939.python-list@python.org> <75c82449-773e-4077-a6c9-e9cef08f845f@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidm7vg3ucvgm=TzAjQyS8VBWY6ouK0himZ45mPpPL+e-UA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:01:00 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1533.1360386069.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 26 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1360386069 news.xs4all.nl 6857 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43365 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:38498 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Rick Johnson
> <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What the hell? Oh yeah, you must be using pike again. No, if it were pike the list would look like this:
>>
>> ({({"q"}), ({"w","e"}), ({"r","t","u"}), ({"i","o","p"})})
>>
>> Folks, i couldn't make this stuff up if i wanted to. Go read for yourself if want a few laughs.
>
> You didn't even do a good job of it. Yes, Pike uses two characters
> instead of one to wrap array literals. Big friggin' whoop. On the
> minus side, it's a little more typing. On the plus side, they stand
> out better, and you don't have the [] characters doing double duty
> denoting list literals and indexing alike.
Oh, is *THAT* what he meant. I had no idea why it was so laughable.
Another advantage of using two characters: There's no conflict between
set and dict literals. How do you notate an empty set in Python? {}
means an empty dict. In Pike, a mapping is ([]) and a multiset (you
can actually have duplicates, though I don't usually make use of that)
is (<>). But that's a pretty minor design decision, and I wouldn't
laugh at either for the choice. It's like choosing to paint your car
blue or red.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:16 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 23:27 -0700
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:32 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:32 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-09 02:16 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 09:48 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-08 12:58 -0500
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 11:58 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 11:05 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 16:49 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 12:17 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:54 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 16:04 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:28 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 23:50 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:28 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 00:52 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:24 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:24 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:28 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:28 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:54 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 18:29 -0700
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 16:01 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:26 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 15:50 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 18:09 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 18:09 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-10 22:37 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-10 09:45 -0500
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2013-02-10 18:06 +0100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:18 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 23:40 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:13 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 00:35 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:00 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:00 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-11 17:06 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 16:55 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 09:48 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 08:24 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-12 18:43 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-12 18:43 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 13:12 -0700
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-16 11:12 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 09:48 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-11 17:06 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:13 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 21:09 +0200
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:26 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 16:49 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 18:06 -0700
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 22:25 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 22:25 -0800
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-09 14:16 +1100
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-09 15:36 -0500
Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 21:12 -0800
csiph-web