Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #38486

Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'anyway.': 0.04; 'say,': 0.05; 'semantic': 0.07; 'sequences.': 0.07; 'type,': 0.07; '(1,': 0.09; '3),': 0.09; 'subclass': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'substitution': 0.09; 'throws': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; '"things': 0.16; 'advocating': 0.16; 'design?': 0.16; 'hierarchy': 0.16; 'operator.': 0.16; 'serve.': 0.16; 'violated': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'input': 0.18; 'feb': 0.19; 'equivalent': 0.20; 'holds': 0.20; 'proposed': 0.20; 'trying': 0.21; 'bit': 0.21; 'meant': 0.21; 'fine,': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'errors': 0.23; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'guess': 0.27; 'question': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'oop': 0.29; 'types.': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'fri,': 0.30; 'function': 0.30; 'sense': 0.31; 'johnson': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'function.': 0.33; 'mixed': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'sequence': 0.35; 'so,': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'bad': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'apply': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; 'you.': 0.61; "you've": 0.61; 'share': 0.61; 'skip:n 10': 0.63; 'here': 0.65; 'decided': 0.65; 'sum': 0.66; 'special': 0.73; 'goal': 0.74; 'yourself': 0.77; '/only/': 0.84; '2013': 0.84; 'answer:': 0.84; 'encounters': 0.84; 'rick': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OEgnuPiml3O7wLM7PlDX4RZ8CD+egaQmwswNo7CoVZ8=; b=GDZZ12k/pOmIu/NH7dJt9C/xiM3Nuz3lBhOXliK/tUgm8JgmaIOwV/jBvvAR3+HKdZ hWRu/r3Vs15HSp+5BEubWGErzC+yT5a/4z9X41ZV41a+BF13P4+3A/Y/2rKS6pQw1fTp giYCqyXeBqWusJBavX+oEFqixUwOxoDk37NiUcqVHdCBSYup+fFHYU7CgeVhxvmFHPrO KWX7h+Ifi7OQa2wdUVzknXHeACn7cS5qjuqya3kCKtFzQ1pMWl2wuOlIkZhjFNQFYgUR d/QugdNJ8BDf2Def0WTciB9q43waQfOIBHpvVSYovxehWs326lFWBD13nYDQJ1V2ltgx msgQ==
X-Received by 10.66.87.67 with SMTP id v3mr22753362paz.63.1360372034199; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:07:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <62c3e7bb-d023-43b4-b759-f424707fd346@googlegroups.com>
References <mailman.2132.1342341291.4697.python-list@python.org> <5002a1f9$0$29995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2141.1342369188.4697.python-list@python.org> <7b027612-a07e-40f9-8ad2-3e95c5440482@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2148.1342375350.4697.python-list@python.org> <bbc44546-ffb7-4ff9-bd43-3bfa068df75f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2154.1342389192.4697.python-list@python.org> <86872ad2-fda0-403b-9f18-d1cb18e41860@t32g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmov--b_s5e=OYsWWV8w6byj5a+28NNu-vRWGV8mr8w5cg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2159.1342404957.4697.python-list@python.org> <50039290$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2197.1342498752.4697.python-list@python.org> <9309333c-13a0-464c-bd94-9c682363b8c9@googlegroups.com> <511516db$0$29969$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <ee71b775-b527-4bb3-a080-12aad962b0ba@googlegroups.com> <62c3e7bb-d023-43b4-b759-f424707fd346@googlegroups.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:06:34 -0700
Subject Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements
To Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Cc Python <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1525.1360372044.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 30
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1360372044 news.xs4all.nl 6889 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57240
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:38486

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Rick Johnson
<rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm a bit unnerved by the sum function. Summing a sequence only makes sense if the sequence in question contains /only/ numeric types. For that reason i decided to create a special type for holding Numerics. This will probably result in many complaints from lazy people who want to use only one Sequence type, which holds mixed types, THEN jamb nothing but numeric types into it, THEN have a sum method that throws errors when it encounters a non-numeric type!!! I say, too bad for you.
>
> Stop obfuscating your code! Of course someone could probably find a legitimate reason to apply a sum method to non-numeric values; if so, then inherit from NumericSequence and create your custom type!

Are you aware that the approach you're advocating here is bad OOP
design?  If you declare a class NumericSequence with the property that
it contains only numeric types, and then you declare a subclass
NonnumericSequence that does not share that property, then guess what?
 You've just violated the Liskov Substitution Principle.

The goal you're trying to achieve here is nonsensical anyway.  Ask
yourself what the semantic meaning of the sum() function is, what
purpose it is meant to serve.  My answer: it is the reduction of the
addition operator.  The implication of this is that the input type of
the sum() function is not "numbers", but rather "things that can be
added".  That includes numbers, but since I see from your proposed
class hierarchy that you are retaining the __add__ method on
sequences, it also includes sequences.  Are you really going to tell
the user that (1, 2, 3) + (4, 5, 6) is perfectly fine, but that the
semantic equivalent sum([(1, 2, 3), (4, 5, 6)]) is nonsense?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:16 -0800
  Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 23:27 -0700
    Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:32 -0800
    Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:32 -0800
  Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-09 02:16 +1100
    Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 09:48 -0800
      Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-08 12:58 -0500
      Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 11:58 -0800
        Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 11:05 +1100
          Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 16:49 -0800
            Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 12:17 +1100
              Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:54 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 16:04 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:28 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 23:50 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:28 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 00:52 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:24 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:24 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:28 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:28 -0800
              Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:54 -0800
            Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 18:29 -0700
            Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 16:01 +1100
              Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:26 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 15:50 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 18:09 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-10 18:09 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-10 22:37 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-02-10 09:45 -0500
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2013-02-10 18:06 +0100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 04:18 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 23:40 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:13 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 00:35 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:00 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 20:00 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-11 17:06 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 16:55 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 09:48 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-13 08:24 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-12 18:43 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-12 18:43 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 13:12 -0700
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-16 11:12 +1100
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-12 09:48 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-11 17:06 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 05:13 -0800
                Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 21:09 +0200
              Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 20:26 -0800
          Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 16:49 -0800
        Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 18:06 -0700
          Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 22:25 -0800
          Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 22:25 -0800
      Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-09 14:16 +1100
        Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-09 15:36 -0500
      Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-02-11 21:12 -0800

csiph-web