Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #92038

Re: Argument Presence Checking via Identity or Boolean Operation?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'defaults': 0.05; 'none:': 0.05; 'advice.': 0.09; 'none.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'bug': 0.10; 'def': 0.14; 'applies': 0.15; 'argument': 0.15; 'value.': 0.15; '"none"': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'evaluates': 0.16; 'false:': 0.16; 'former,': 0.16; "method's": 0.16; 'operators.': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'sentinel': 0.16; 'set,': 0.16; 'singleton': 0.16; 'variable': 0.20; 'compare': 0.20; 'arguments': 0.22; 'explicit': 0.22; 'testing': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'checking': 0.27; 'equivalent': 0.27; 'not.': 0.27; '(such': 0.27; 'fine': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'always,': 0.29; 'comparison': 0.29; 'equality': 0.29; 'pep': 0.29; 'no,': 0.29; 'e.g.': 0.31; "i'd": 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'subject:?': 0.34; 'google': 0.34; 'that,': 0.34; 'could': 0.35; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.35; 'done': 0.35; 'false': 0.35; 'identity': 0.35; 'set.': 0.35; 'really': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'possible.': 0.36; 'should': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'instead': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'say': 0.38; 'doing': 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'test': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'some': 0.40; 'better.': 0.66; '_o__)': 0.84; 'container)': 0.84; 'received:125': 0.84; 'russell': 0.84; 'subject:via': 0.84; '\xe2\x80\xa6': 0.84; 'hand,': 0.97
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Subject Re: Argument Presence Checking via Identity or Boolean Operation?
Date Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:39:56 +1000
References <CAAKgPaGY_4yB7z=R-UO=s5TEWwEXZsE1nSEXw00sQPMfH_Xt2g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host jigong.madmonks.org
X-Public-Key-ID 0xAC128405
X-Public-Key-Fingerprint 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405
X-Public-Key-URL http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc
X-Post-From Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:QGIVKnSKgXNw6GwdgGlCVZYyOQc=
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.151.1433403620.13271.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 60
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1433403620 news.xs4all.nl 2901 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40279
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:92038

Show key headers only | View raw


Russell Brennan <RussellJBrennan@gmail.com> writes:

> I'm going to x-post this to stackoverflow but...
>
> When checking a method's arguments to see whether they were set, is it
> pythonic to do an identity check:
>
> def doThis(arg1, arg2=None):
>   if arg2 is None:
>     arg2 = myClass()

That is the Pythonic way to test whether an argument was set.

> In support of the former, PEP 8 states:
>
> Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or
> is not , never the equality operators. Also, beware of writing if x
> when you really mean if x is not None -- e.g. when testing whether a
> variable or argument that defaults to None was set to some other
> value. The other value might have a type (such as a container) that
> could be false in a boolean context!

Yes. That's good advice.

> On the other hand, from the Google style guide:
>
> Use the "implicit" false if at all possible. ...

That's an over-statement. I'd say it is a bug in the document; “if not
otherwise contradicted by the style guide” is better.

What they are likely warning against is code like this::

    if foo is False:
        # …

which should instead be written::

    if not foo:
        # …

If the guide is not explicit about that, it should be.

> But at the same time states...
>
> Never use == or != to compare singletons like None. Use is or is not.
>
>
> Does this apply to "None" since it evaluates to False always, and/or is a
> boolean comparison equivalent to ==/!= under the hood?

No, it applies to None because it is a singleton and designed to be a
sentinel value.

-- 
 \         “A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing |
  `\                                                 well.” —anonymous |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Argument Presence Checking via Identity or Boolean Operation? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-06-04 17:39 +1000

csiph-web