Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #101120

Re: We will be moving to GitHub

From Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: We will be moving to GitHub
Date 2016-01-01 15:08 -0600
Message-ID <mailman.150.1451682524.11925.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <n66kmg$ig$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAJ4+4apactRU7=7Civoy_csOb2i0iXn=SHtBVYpH1YNVTt0SaQ@mail.gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:03 PM,  <paul.hermeneutic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a summary document that discusses the options examined and why
> others did not meet the requirements? I am -NOT- trying to dredge up
> arguments about the choice. I am guessing that there have been some.

Easiest would be to look through the archives of the core-workflow
mailing list: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/

> If this fact-based decision was based solely on the fact that the BDFL
> prefers GitHub, please just say so. It is clear that git is a capable tool.

There were three reasons given in Brett's decision message:

   1. No major distinguishing features between GitHub or GitLab

Note that GitHub and GitLab were the only proposals under
consideration; nobody else stepped up to champion any other solution.

   2. Familiarity amongst core devs -- and external contributors -- with GitHub
   3. Guido prefers GitHub

Guido repeatedly stated that his preference should not be taken into
account.  I believe Brett gave it little weight, but obviously it was
in his mind.

-- 
Zach

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: We will be moving to GitHub Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 15:08 -0600

csiph-web