Re: Style question: Nicknames for deeply nested objects

Path	csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!news2.arglkargh.de!news.wiretrip.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<prvs=005fc69a5=jeanmichel@sequans.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.017
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.97; 'S': 0.00; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'solved': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.14; '"import': 0.16; '[snip]': 0.16; 'encounter': 0.16; 'model.': 0.16; 'received:192.168.200': 0.16; 'variable': 0.18; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'guess': 0.21; 'object': 0.22; 'subject:question': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.23; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.24; 'problem': 0.28; 'nested': 0.30; 'objects.': 0.30; 'all,': 0.30; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'considering': 0.31; 'thinking': 0.32; 'however,': 0.32; 'store': 0.34; 'received:192': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'using': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'fine.': 0.36; 'received:192.168': 0.37; 'too': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'sign': 0.39; 'skip:a 20': 0.40; 'your': 0.61; 'overall': 0.62; 'today': 0.71
X-IronPort-AV	E=Sophos;i="4.60,403,1291590000"; d="scan'208";a="940969"
X-Virus-Scanned	amavisd-new at zimbra.sequans.com
Date	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:15:13 +0100
From	Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com>
User-Agent	Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100328)
MIME-Version	1.0
To	Gerald Britton <gerald.britton@gmail.com>
Subject	Re: Style question: Nicknames for deeply nested objects
References	<AANLkTi=CWsm7_R6av-0=d2JPfTq=MNaynnedpchF3s1T@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To	<AANLkTi=CWsm7_R6av-0=d2JPfTq=MNaynnedpchF3s1T@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Cc	"python-list \(General\)" <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1494.1296472522.6505.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	31
NNTP-Posting-Host	82.94.164.166
X-Trace	1296472522 news.xs4all.nl 81475 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:35746
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:56023

Show key headers only | View raw

Gerald Britton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today I was thinking about a problem I often encounter.  
> [snip]
>
> 1. You need to call this thing many times with different arguments, so
> you wind up with:
>
>    x = some.deeply.nested.object.method(some.other.deeply.nested.object.value1)
>    y = some.deeply.nested.object.method(some.other.deeply.nested.object.value2)
>    z = some.deeply.nested.object.method(some.other.deeply.nested.object.value3)
> [snip]
> --
> Gerald Britton
>   
This is not solved by style but by design.
You simply don't use too much nested objects. That's a sign of something 
wrong in your overall object model.

Since I do not encounter this problem as often as you are, I guess it is 
a matter of habbits.

however, considering what

"import a.module.that.is.quite.nested as myModule"

is doing, I guess using a local variable to store your nested method is 
just fine.

JM

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Style question: Nicknames for deeply nested objects Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> - 2011-01-31 12:15 +0100

csiph-web