Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #45018
| References | <CAEH=cXW9Vtu2xGkppOutkqBs6nXVTKSQLPWza_FcvXnjxNJL+Q@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-09 09:22 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: PIL: check if image is animated |
| From | Sven <svenito@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1487.1368087777.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Figured out my issue. I did called the check_animated function more than
once and the second call causes the exception unless I seek back to 0
On 6 May 2013 21:57, Sven <svenito@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to check if an image is animated. I can't rely on the
> extension as it may be a gif that's been renamed to .jpg or something else
> and is still animated.
>
> I thought that this used to work:
>
> from PIL import Image
>
>
> def check_animated(img):
> try:
> img.seek(1)
> except (EOFError):
> return 0
> return 1
>
> img = Image('image.jpg')
> print "animated?", check_animated(img)
>
> Regardless if it's animated or not I get this exception:
> ValueError: cannot seek to frame 1
>
> I need to return 0 or 1, so excuse not using True or False.
>
> Did the above get deprecated/change in a version at some point? Perhaps
> there's something I missed during install (using PIP). Are there any other
> ways to accomplish what I am trying to do, with or without PIL?
>
> Python 2.7, linux
>
> --
> ./Sven
>
--
./Sven
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: PIL: check if image is animated Sven <svenito@gmail.com> - 2013-05-09 09:22 +0100
csiph-web