Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38416
| Date | 2013-02-07 22:24 -0800 |
|---|---|
| Subject | memoryview (was "len() on mutables vs. immutables") |
| From | Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1483.1360304707.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2013-02-07 8:30 PM, "Terry Reedy" <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: >So you may assume I've been bitten far too many times by incorrect assumptions about implementations that ended up actually doing something quite silly. Having said that, I felt fairly safe in making that assumption with Python, but figured I'd write something about my findings as I dug around the source in order to answer the question for myself. Still wondering about memoryview though: If a memoryview (3+) is representing a non-continuguous block of memory (> 1 ndim), will len(obj) not return incorrect results? It seems to be reporting the shape of the 0th dim at the moment.. Or is there something that I'm missing altogether?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
memoryview (was "len() on mutables vs. immutables") Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 22:24 -0800
csiph-web