Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #10305
| Date | 2011-07-25 13:07 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: Pipe in the "return" statement |
| References | <acaab166-32c1-43df-b1a4-e3b47c62be36@m10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <9954ddFkjuU10@mid.individual.net> <1c175da2-79f4-40ed-803f-217dc935df6c@m8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <j0juod$193$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1472.1311623510.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Billy Mays wrote: > On 07/25/2011 10:16 AM, Archard Lias wrote: >> On Jul 25, 2:03 pm, Ian Collins<ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/26/11 12:00 AM, Archard Lias wrote: >>>> Still I dont get how I am supposed to understand the pipe and its task/ >>>> idea/influece on control flow, of: >>>> return<statement> |<statement> >>>> ?? >>> >>> It's simply a bitwise OR. >> >> Yes, but how does it get determined, which one actually gets returned? > > The return statement returns a single value from a function context. The > pipe operator takes 2 values and bitwise ORs* them together. That > result is then returned to the caller. Just for completeness, if the actual line had been return <statement1> or <statement2> then Python would compute <statement1>, and if its boolean value was True would return the computation of <statement1>, otherwise it would compute <statement2> and return that. When 'or' is used, the first truthy* item is return, or the last falsey* item if none evaluate to True. --> None or 2 or 0 2 --> None or 2 or 3 2 --> None or [] or 0 0 With 'and', the first falsey item is returned, unless all the items are truthy in which case the last item is returned: --> 2 and 3 3 --> 2 and 0 and 9 0 Hope this helps. ~Ethan~ * 'truthy' = bool(some expression or object) == True * 'falsey' = bool(some expression or object) == False
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pipe in the "return" statement Archard Lias <archardlias@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-25 05:00 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-26 00:03 +1200
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Archard Lias <archardlias@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-25 07:16 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Billy Mays <81282ed9a88799d21e77957df2d84bd6514d9af6@myhashismyemail.com> - 2011-07-25 10:31 -0400
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-07-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-28 08:26 +0200
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Oliver Bestwalter <oliver@bestwalter.de> - 2011-07-25 16:35 +0200
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Archard Lias <archardlias@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-25 08:05 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2011-07-25 14:39 +0000
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Archard Lias <archardlias@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-25 08:06 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 07:42 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-07-25 14:33 +0200
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Archard Lias <archardlias@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-25 08:28 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-07-25 18:11 +0200
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement Archard Lias <archardlias@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-25 09:30 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement TonyO <guinness.tony@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 05:52 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 06:00 -0700
Re: Pipe in the "return" statement red floyd <redfloyd@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 14:04 -0700
reading zipfile; problem using raw buffer "Sells, Fred" <fred.sells@adventistcare.org> - 2011-07-26 08:42 -0400
Re: reading zipfile; problem using raw buffer Billy Mays <81282ed9a88799d21e77957df2d84bd6514d9af6@myhashismyemail.com> - 2011-07-26 08:49 -0400
Re: reading zipfile; problem using raw buffer Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-07-26 15:04 +0200
RE: reading zipfile; problem using raw buffer "Sells, Fred" <fred.sells@adventistcare.org> - 2011-07-26 11:22 -0400
csiph-web