Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #35808
| Date | 2012-12-30 18:04 +0000 |
|---|---|
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| Subject | Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? |
| References | <50e02485$0$3109$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <mailman.1467.1356885520.29569.python-list@python.org> <roy-0011CF.12321430122012@news.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1468.1356890644.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2012-12-30 17:32, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <mailman.1467.1356885520.29569.python-list@python.org>,
> Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> you may check the new regex implementation for python
>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
>
> Wow, I wasn't aware of such an effort.
>
> At first reading, I'm amused by the concept of "strict fuzzy matching".
>
> Those of us with long memories will be confused by the name of the
> module, however. To me, "regex" is the old version, and "re" is the new
> (http://docs.python.org/release/1.5.1/lib/module-regex.html). Now, it's
> going to be "regex" is either the really old, or the really new version,
> and "re" is what came in between. I suppose the next iteration after
> this will be called "re" again :-)
>
> I'm not sure I like the fuzzy matching stuff. On the one hand, it can
> be useful. On the other hand, people already complain about how
> difficult it can be to read regexes. Once we add things like
> {i<=1,d<=1,s<=1,2i+2d+1s<=4} in the mix, it's going to be total line
> noise.
>
The request for fuzzy matching came after someone saw the TRE library:
http://laurikari.net/tre/
The difference is that the syntax is a bit clearer, IMHO. :-)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@skynet.be> - 2012-12-30 11:24 +0000
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-12-30 10:20 -0500
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2012-12-30 10:41 -0500
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-01-01 04:14 +0000
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 00:09 +0100
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-01-02 06:17 -0800
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-01-02 06:17 -0800
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2012-12-30 17:38 +0100
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-12-30 12:32 -0500
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-12-30 18:04 +0000
Re: ignore case only for a part of the regex? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2012-12-31 11:29 +1100
csiph-web