Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #38382

Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.006
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'msg': 0.07; 'correct,': 0.09; 'dict': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'wrong,': 0.09; '2.7.3': 0.16; 'caches': 0.16; 'called,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:search': 0.16; 'time.time()': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'basically': 0.17; 'skip:{ 20': 0.17; 'code,': 0.18; 'feb': 0.19; 'otherwise,': 0.20; 'work.': 0.23; 'demonstrate': 0.23; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'guess': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'subject:/': 0.28; 'actual': 0.28; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'maybe': 0.29; 'fri,': 0.30; 'function': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'could': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'hopefully': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'faster': 0.35; 'doing': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'except': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'data.': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'show': 0.63; 'making': 0.64; 'gave': 0.65; '+1100': 0.84; '2013': 0.84; 'received:sd.cox.net': 0.84; 'subject:via': 0.84; 'results,': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com>
Subject Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex
Date Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:13:26 -0800
References <mailman.1426.1360187770.2939.python-list@python.org> <511319c7$0$21812$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1437.1360207874.2939.python-list@python.org> <51142e96$0$6512$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host ip68-227-87-145.sb.sd.cox.net
User-Agent dsodnetnin
X-Mailer EZnn0.37p
X-Newsreader EZnn0.37p
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host EZnn0.37p
Original-Received from slem by 1.1 with local
X-No-Archive yes
Archive no
X-Archive expiry=11
X-Archive encrypt
X-Operating-System Barebones_6.1
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 192.168.1.1
X-NNTP-Posting-Host 192.168.1.1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1460.1360278819.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 44
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1360278819 news.xs4all.nl 6912 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40046
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:38382

Show key headers only | View raw


On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:45:41 +1100
Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:

> rh wrote:
> 
> > I am using 2.7.3 and I put the re.compile outside the function and
> > it performed faster than urlparse. I don't print out the data.
> 
> I find that hard to believe. re.compile caches its results, so except
> for the very first time it is called, it is very fast -- basically a
> function call and a dict lookup. I find it implausible that a
> micro-optimization such as you describe could be responsible for
> speeding the code up by over 33%.

Not sure where you came up with that number. Maybe another post?
I never gave any numbers, just comparisons.

> 
> But since you don't demonstrate any actual working code, you could be
> correct, or you could be timing it wrong. Without seeing your timing
> code, my guess is that you are doing it wrong. Timing code is tricky,
> which is why I always show my work. If I get it wrong, someone will
> hopefully tell me. Otherwise, I might as well be making up the
> numbers.

re.compile
starttime = time.time()
for i in range(numloops):
    u2f()

msg = '\nElapsed {0:.3f}'.format(time.time() - starttime)
print(msg)

> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steven
> 


-- 

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2013-02-06 13:55 -0800
  Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-07 03:04 +0000
    Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-06 19:31 -0800
      Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-08 09:45 +1100
        Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-07 15:13 -0800
          Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-08 10:59 +1100
            Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 17:55 -0700
              Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-08 14:02 +1100
                Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-07 21:35 -0800
            Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 18:08 -0700
            Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-07 21:57 -0800
            Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 01:21 -0700
              Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-08 22:43 +1100
                Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 09:26 -0700
            Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2013-02-15 22:58 +0200
            Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex rh <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-26 11:20 -0800
        Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-02-08 01:27 -0500
    Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex jmfauth <wxjmfauth@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 03:08 -0800
      Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 23:44 +1100

csiph-web