Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #5161

Re: How to deal with optional argument evaluation

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.004
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; '1-5': 0.09; 'etc...': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'hash': 0.09; 'hostname': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'optional.': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'def': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'matches.': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'self,': 0.16; 'this?': 0.18; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'code': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.22; 'keys': 0.23; 'skip:k 20': 0.23; 'skip:_ 20': 0.24; 'field,': 0.25; 'skip:# 10': 0.25; "i'm": 0.26; 'class': 0.29; 'elements': 0.29; 'host': 0.30; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.31; 'information?': 0.31; 'does': 0.31; 'someone': 0.33; 'uses': 0.34; 'actually': 0.34; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.35; 'else': 0.37; 'subject:with': 0.37; 'how': 0.39; 'takes': 0.40; 'feed': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'received:hostgator.com': 0.64; 'supply': 0.68; 'dealing': 0.71; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.71; 'evaluate': 0.72; 'subject:deal': 0.84; 'supplies': 0.84; 'received:69.93': 0.91; 'scenario': 0.91; 'zone': 0.91; 'brown': 0.97
Date Wed, 11 May 2011 14:26:02 -0700
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
User-Agent Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version 1.0
To Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown@gmail.com>
Subject Re: How to deal with optional argument evaluation
References <BANLkTimqPiwre+AAYt-TdWv4kjb9Cb_C-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To <BANLkTimqPiwre+AAYt-TdWv4kjb9Cb_C-w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us
X-Source
X-Source-Args
X-Source-Dir
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1430.1305148447.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 55
NNTP-Posting-Host 82.94.164.166
X-Trace 1305148447 news.xs4all.nl 41117 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:51789
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:5161

Show key headers only | View raw


Rodrick Brown wrote:
> I'm having a hard time dealing with the following scenario
>  
> My class takes a hash like the following:
> rdargs = 
> {'env:'prod','feed':'opra','hostname':'host13dkp1','process':'delta','side':'a','zone','ny'}
>  
> All the keys in this hash can be optional.
>  
> I'm having a hard time dealing with all 36 possible combinations and I 
> dont want to use a monstorous if not and else or etc... to evaluate all 
> possible combinations before I call my search routine.
>  
> How do others deal with situations like this? And have it look readable?
>  
> if someone supplies just a host and side my search can return 400 
> responses, if they supply all 6 elements it can return just 1-5 matches.
> 
> class RD(object):
>    def __init__(self,**kwargs):
>        self.value = 0
>        #for field in ('env', 'side', 'zone', 'feed', 'hostname', 
> 'process', 'status'):
>            #val = kwargs[field] if kwargs.has_key(field) else False
>            #setattr(self, field, val)
>        self.env = kwargs.get('env',False)
>        self.side = kwargs.get('side',False)
>        self.zone = kwargs.get('zone',False)
>        self.feed = kwargs.get('feed',False)
>        self.hostname = kwargs.get('hostname',False)
>        self.process = kwargs.get('process',False)
>        self.status = kwargs.get('status',False)

class RD(object):
     def __init__(
         self,
         env=False,
         side=False,
         zone=False,
         feed=False,
         hostname=False,
         process=False,
         status=False
         ):
             self.env = env
             self.side = side
             self.zone = zone
             self.feed = feed
             self.hostname = hostname
             self.process = process
             self.status = status

What does the code look like that actually uses this information?

~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: How to deal with optional argument evaluation Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-11 14:26 -0700

csiph-web