Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38279
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <davea@davea.name> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.032 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'function,': 0.07; 'used.': 0.07; 'callback': 0.09; 'func': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'called,': 0.16; 'did,': 0.16; 'eckhardt': 0.16; 'funcs': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'creates': 0.18; 'code.': 0.20; 'anonymous': 0.22; 'work,': 0.22; "haven't": 0.23; 'least': 0.25; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; "i'm": 0.29; 'function': 0.30; 'print': 0.32; 'defining': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'thanks': 0.34; 'doing': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'item': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'step': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'back': 0.62; 'series': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'obvious': 0.71; 'received:74.208': 0.71; 'discover': 0.72; 'greetings!': 0.84; 'local,': 0.84; 'received:74.208.4.194': 0.84 |
| Date | Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:37:07 -0500 |
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: puzzled by name binding in local function |
| References | <jek7u9-aaq.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> <mailman.1374.1360087665.2939.python-list@python.org> <fbn9u9-9fv.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> |
| In-Reply-To | <fbn9u9-9fv.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Provags-ID | V02:K0:ouOcgZAAb3abNejsn+GT6Na2Zigy7PXGvPdKqflm1zd o7pZ883DQ8JR2sZxcR+qofppCvguQ+FoLUN9CNz3UbTbd8n7ar kbU0qLdcnuNmn7JLV4GYz4BcLg6lcd30GnCDBSbUMgUivQ1NfW IAAPWsXFUbBs9t+fYqZnnbZY+PksGcWwWrEjcmyZLvvQyyQAki QE+DRudVV6BKg73rvgfRej6+guVxEQGUF61HgKDRj7neGG2CD+ ZH6qKQAtLx6hC3C46rb14Qrr6PVRcXJwLpbj07ZHFv/q2GjpbD 5epNQup2wx3cWGipYenQRwR9BYnAWqSDrXPjYVRdqhXU9SFBA= = |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1412.1360161459.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 49 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1360161459 news.xs4all.nl 6939 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50669 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:38279 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 02/06/2013 05:19 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> Dave and Terry,
>
> Thanks you both for your explanations! I really appreciate the time you
> took.
>
> Am 05.02.2013 19:07, schrieb Dave Angel:
>> <snip>
>
>> The main place where I see this type of problem is in a gui, where
>> you're defining a callback to be used by a series of widgets, but you
>> have a value that IS different for each item in the series. You write a
>> loop much like you did, and discover that the last loop value is the
>> only one used. The two cures above work, and you can also use lambda
>> creatively.
>
> Careful, lambda does not work, at least not easily! The problem is that
> lambda only creates a local, anonymous function, but any names used
> inside this function will only be evaluated when the function is called,
> so I'm back at step 1, just with even less obvious code.
>
>
> Greetings!
>
> Uli
>
>
I haven't been able to reconstruct it exactly, but here's the function
equivalent:
def myfunc2(i):
def myfunc2b():
print ("myfunc2 is using", i)
return myfunc2b
funcs = []
for i in range(5):
funcs.append(myfunc2(i))
print "Now doing the loop2"
for func in funcs:
func()
--
DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
puzzled by name binding in local function Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2013-02-05 16:18 +0100
Re: puzzled by name binding in local function Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-02-05 13:07 -0500
Re: puzzled by name binding in local function Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2013-02-06 11:19 +0100
Re: puzzled by name binding in local function Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-02-06 09:37 -0500
Re: puzzled by name binding in local function Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2013-02-07 09:59 +0100
Re: puzzled by name binding in local function Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-05 14:27 -0500
csiph-web