Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #78016
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? |
| Date | 2014-09-18 09:46 -0400 |
| References | <efcc61e6-f132-4f14-80b5-0536816b6c7b@googlegroups.com> <mailman.14101.1411042251.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-E21095.08580518092014@news.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.14106.1411048023.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 9/18/2014 8:58 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > I suspect what he meant was "How can I tell if I'm iterating over an > ordered collection?", i.e. iterating over a list vs. iterating over a > set. One can check whether the iterable is a tuple, list, range, or tuple or list iterator (the latter not being re-iterable). >>> type(iter([])) <class 'list_iterator'> >>> type(iter(())) <class 'tuple_iterator'> > Is there anything which requires an iterator to be deterministic? No. An iterator can yields random number, input from a non-deterministic source -- human or mechanical, or items from a collection in shuffled order. Generator that do such can easily be turned into the __iter__ method of a class. > For example, let's say I have an iterable, i, and I do: > > list1 = [item for item in i] > list2 = [item for item in i] If i is an iterator or other non-reiterable, list2 will be empty. If i is an instance of a class with a non-deterministic __iter__ method, list2 will not necessarily be either empty or a copy of list1. > am I guaranteed that list1 == list2? Clearly not. > It will be for all the collections I can think of in the standard library, but if I wrote my own class with > an __iter__() which yielded the items in a non-deterministic order, > would I be violating something other than the principle of least > astonishment? There should not be any astonishment. 'Iterable' is a much broader category than 'deterministically re-iterable iterable'. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? cool-RR <ram.rachum@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 04:55 -0700
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 22:10 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-09-18 08:58 -0400
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 23:33 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-09-18 19:52 -0400
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 12:45 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-09-19 18:02 -0400
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 15:01 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-09-18 09:46 -0400
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-09-18 09:32 -0500
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-09-19 15:15 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 15:40 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-09-19 20:59 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 21:19 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-09-19 21:58 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 22:06 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 21:25 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-09-19 21:46 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 21:56 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-19 12:26 +0000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 22:36 +1000
Re: Is there a canonical way to check whether an iterable is ordered? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-09-19 15:04 +1000
csiph-web