Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #77938
| From | Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: [OT] Question about Git branches |
| Date | 2014-09-16 17:08 +0100 |
| References | <mailman.14043.1410848545.18130.python-list@python.org> <878ulk7z7y.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.14046.1410856162.18130.python-list@python.org> <541829b4$0$29995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.14059.1410884611.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2014-09-16 13:14, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote: >>> "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com>: >>> >>>> You are encouraged to make liberal use of 'branches', >>> >>> Personally, I only use forks, IOW, "git clone". I encourage that >>> practice. Then, there is little need for "git checkout". Instead, I just >>> cd to a different directory. >>> >>> Branches and clones are highly analogous processwise; I would go so far >>> as to say that they are redundant. >> >> But rather than listening to, shall we say, *strange* advice like >> this, Frank, you'll do well to pick up a reliable git tutorial, which >> should explain branches, commits, the working tree, etc, etc, etc. > > Isn't this "strange advice" standard operating procedure in Mercurial? I'm > not an expert on either hg or git, but if I've understood hg correctly, the > way to begin an experimental branch is to use hg clone. Yes, but this is due to different design decisions of git and Mercurial. git prioritized the multiple branches in a single clone use case; Mercurial prioritized re-cloning. It's natural to do this kind of branching in git, and more natural to re-clone in Mercurial. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[OT] Question about Git branches "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-09-16 08:22 +0200
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-09-16 11:21 +0300
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 18:29 +1000
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-09-16 22:14 +1000
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 22:48 +1000
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 22:50 +1000
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 17:08 +0100
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-17 02:25 +1000
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 20:11 +0100
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney@gmail.com> - 2014-09-17 11:47 +1000
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-09-16 10:59 +0200
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> - 2014-09-17 14:16 +0400
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Jason Swails <jason.swails@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 09:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-09-17 02:26 +0300
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> - 2014-09-17 16:04 +0400
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-09-17 17:52 +0200
Re: [OT] Question about Git branches Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 02:00 +1000
csiph-web