Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #38255

Re: Opinion on best practice...

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <torriem@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.006
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'bash': 0.07; 'function,': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'generators': 0.09; 'grep': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; '*only*': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'uniq': 0.16; 'url:dabeaz': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'shell': 0.18; 'sort': 0.21; 'trying': 0.21; 'script': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'rest': 0.28; 'agreed.': 0.29; 'function.': 0.33; 'like:': 0.33; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'data,': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'too.': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.36; 'programmers': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'execute': 0.37; 'option': 0.37; 'moment': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'most': 0.61; 'here:': 0.62; 'subject:...': 0.63; 'great': 0.64; 'cut': 0.71; 'commands.': 0.84; 'darn': 0.84
X-Virus-Scanned amavisd-new at torriefamily.org
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:07:33 -0700
From Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Opinion on best practice...
References <207d17ce-4bc7-487c-acde-6a7b9f66002b@googlegroups.com> <ker11p$iii$1@reader1.panix.com> <kers04$1gi$2@news.albasani.net> <pan.2013.02.06.03.32.49.578000@nowhere.com>
In-Reply-To <pan.2013.02.06.03.32.49.578000@nowhere.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1402.1360127270.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 21
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1360127270 news.xs4all.nl 6876 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59341
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:38255

Show key headers only | View raw

On 02/05/2013 08:32 PM, Nobody wrote:
> A shell script is only the better option if (almost) the *only* thing the
> script needs to do is to execute commands.
> 
> The moment you start trying to "process" data, it's time to put up with
> the verbosity of subprocess.Popen() so that you can use a well-designed
> language for the rest of it.

Agreed.  And most of the time a script in bash is going to do something
like:

grep blah /from/file | cut -f 1 -d ' ' | uniq | sort

Python generators happen to be very efficient at recreating this sort of
thing entirely in python.  A great presentation that all system
programmers should read is found here:

http://www.dabeaz.com/generators/

Very cool stuff.  Grep is just a generator function.  cut is just a
generator function, and so on.  And it can be pretty darn fast too.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Opinion on best practice... Anthony Correia <akcorreia@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 20:14 -0800
  Re: Opinion on best practice... Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 23:04 -0700
  Re: Opinion on best practice... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-05 02:56 -0500
    Re: Opinion on best practice... Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-02-05 13:23 +0000
  Re: Opinion on best practice... Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2013-02-05 08:56 +0100
    Re: Opinion on best practice... Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-02-05 11:35 +0100
      Re: Opinion on best practice... Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2013-02-05 14:05 +0100
  Re: Opinion on best practice... Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-02-05 13:22 +0000
    Re: Opinion on best practice... Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2013-02-05 21:01 +0000
      Re: Opinion on best practice... Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-02-05 21:39 +0000
        Re: Opinion on best practice... Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-02-05 14:07 -0800
          Re: Opinion on best practice... Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-02-05 23:00 +0000
            Re: Opinion on best practice... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-06 10:35 +1100
              Re: Opinion on best practice... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-06 12:55 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 18:14 -0800
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-06 17:16 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 23:32 -0800
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-02-06 15:18 +0000
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-06 12:37 -0500
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-07 10:46 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 16:28 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-07 06:50 +0000
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 18:49 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-08 09:49 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-08 17:54 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-08 12:41 -0500
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-07 13:54 -0500
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-02-08 09:58 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-08 13:29 -0500
                Re: Opinion on best practice... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-02-09 11:28 +1100
                Re: Opinion on best practice... John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-02-08 19:10 -0800
            Re: Opinion on best practice... Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-02-06 00:33 -0500
              Re: Opinion on best practice... Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2013-02-06 15:30 +0200
        Re: Opinion on best practice... Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-02-05 22:59 +0000
          Re: Opinion on best practice... Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 17:05 -0700
            Re: Opinion on best practice... Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-02-06 15:04 +0000
          Re: Opinion on best practice... Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-02-06 14:20 +0000
            Re: Opinion on best practice... Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-02-06 15:11 +0000
      Re: Opinion on best practice... Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-02-06 03:32 +0000
        Re: Opinion on best practice... Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 22:07 -0700

csiph-web