Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #103526
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" |
| Date | 2016-02-26 15:11 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.140.1456459915.20994.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <535b56b5-f836-4cd6-ae95-33f18004c90b@googlegroups.com> <dj9d10F4gciU1@mid.individual.net> <mailman.138.1456443525.20994.python-list@python.org> <56cf9f01$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CALwzidkYZDwwxfA1tmZo4FCt173N+BD0wcwHtQLnE+CVOJSwUg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote: >> If you take "Special cases are not special enough" seriously, you will not >> use `import os.path` since os is not a package: >> >> py> os.__package__ >> '' >> >> and os.path is not part of os, it's just a publicly exposed attribute which >> merely happens to be a module. Being a module doesn't make it special, it's >> just another name in the os namespace. I trust that you wouldn't insist on >> writing: >> >> import os.listdir >> >> (especially since that doesn't work). Neither should you insist on writing >> `import os.path`, since path is documented as a public part of the os >> module. It has done so since at least Python 1.5. > > I disagree. The fact that os is not a package is an implementation > detail. I for one wasn't even aware of it prior to reading your post. > > The name of the concurrent.futures module is "concurrent.futures". If > you want to use it, you import concurrent.futures, not concurrent. > > Likewise, the name of the os.path module is "os.path". If you want to > use it, you import os.path, not os. > > The fact that concurrent and os are two different types of things is irrelevant. > > Besides, packages *are* modules. To take another example, collections > is a package (I checked), and collections.abc is a module. But > collections also contains things that aren't modules. If you want to > use collections.abc, you have to import it, but at the same time you > don't import collections.Counter. This demonstrates that the analog > you suggest between os.path and os.listdir is flawed. Steven is right, though. You can "from module import X" and it doesn't matter whether 'module' is a package or a non-package module; but if you say "import module.X", aside from special cases like os.path, you're asserting that 'module' is a package and 'X' is a module within that package. Yes, a package is a module, but the dotted lookup requires a package. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 17:07 -0800
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-02-25 14:39 +1100
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 08:15 -0800
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 08:20 -0800
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-02-25 08:35 -0800
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-02-25 08:51 -0800
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2016-02-25 12:00 -0800
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-02-26 11:20 +1300
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-02-26 10:38 +1100
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-02-26 11:40 +1100
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 20:56 -0700
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:11 +1100
Re: "from module import data; print(data)" vs "import module; print(module.data)" Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-02-26 15:37 +1100
csiph-web