Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #44870

Re: Red Black Tree implementation?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <drsalists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'kind,': 0.05; 'tree': 0.05; '"as': 0.07; 'damages': 0.07; 'granted,': 0.07; 'method.': 0.07; 'implied,': 0.09; 'liability,': 0.09; 'portions': 0.09; 'tort': 0.09; 'trees': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'apache': 0.15; '__del__': 0.16; 'bsd': 0.16; 'bug,': 0.16; 'cc:name:python list': 0.16; 'charge,': 0.16; 'claim,': 0.16; 'dealings': 0.16; 'deletion': 0.16; 'deletions': 0.16; 'element.': 0.16; 'merge,': 0.16; 'modify,': 0.16; 'publish,': 0.16; 'restriction,': 0.16; 'sublicense,': 0.16; 'url:py': 0.16; 'eager': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'properly': 0.19; 'warranties': 0.19; 'later': 0.20; '(the': 0.22; 'code,': 0.22; 'issue.': 0.22; 'otherwise,': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'exists': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'software.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; 'permission': 0.26; 'recognized': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'appear': 0.29; '(c)': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'contract,': 0.30; 'liable': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'included': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'software,': 0.31; 'usually': 0.31; '"do': 0.31; 'conditions:': 0.31; 'holders': 0.31; 'node': 0.31; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.31; 'this.': 0.32; 'probably': 0.32; 'thanks!': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'whom': 0.33; 'limitation': 0.33; "i'd": 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'connection': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'url:eu': 0.37; 'so,': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'starting': 0.37; 'files': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'skip:& 20': 0.39; 'changed': 0.39; 'deleting': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'black': 0.61; 'introduced': 0.61; "you've": 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'become': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'love': 0.65; 'account': 0.65; 'smith': 0.68; 'subject': 0.69; 'bank': 0.76; '&quot;do': 0.84; 'subject:Red': 0.84; 'url:master': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92; 'tomorrow': 0.95; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=3difXJ08wNUAOI24RSaXHKPyO/R3tgdRgO6h+P3cvaQ=; b=yG1scWqGYOu/1H8JmMcOQ+8Gv2Lj5ZBFmH2fNcCRIvsStj/5bjoqpKC4MHkRe38che l0lu2pemHRr+EkEJO3CFojJ9LwQO73AMxV8+1ldDrEoUYrG4VHTYqjOOUpVyRsw1uZ3X 6ZINqYy3y3vVPY74jJhhKPWT3PAc1+EFlL974XSUa1mEwGgkLxey4SOSSSWvQOTdYq0c RQT5G8Fz2sqv/0QawsomOAfHLyVonUhtgcKzYX630EwV7ybREFd4noA0GXXd3fHjEEEb fcayeENIswNtnTVXPFTdxZ5Nrx9IuDrVC7ByjVzu+vvb73l9Q2sgSG1JPwEgV22Yndwx umog==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.224.73.73 with SMTP id p9mr261411qaj.19.1367889608697; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <518850f8$0$8157$862e30e2@ngroups.net>
References <mailman.1225.1367449881.3114.python-list@python.org> <5181ca0e$0$13974$862e30e2@ngroups.net> <mailman.1260.1367546417.3114.python-list@python.org> <518850f8$0$8157$862e30e2@ngroups.net>
Date Mon, 6 May 2013 18:20:08 -0700
Subject Re: Red Black Tree implementation?
From Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com>
Cc Python List <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074d9ac37f91b04dc169edb
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1393.1367889616.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 138
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1367889616 news.xs4all.nl 15865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32878
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:44870

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:55 PM, duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid>wrote:

>
> What license?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
> Here's the text I usually prepend.
>
>
> ##Copyright (c) 2013 duncan g. smith
> ##
> ##Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> ##copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
> "Software"),
> ##to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> ##the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
> ##and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> ##Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> ##
> ##The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included
> ##in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> ##
> ##THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
> ##OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
> MERCHANTABILITY,
> ##FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
> ##THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
> ##OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
> ##ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
> ##OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
>
>
> Basically, "do what you want with it but don't blame me if it goes tits
> up". I'm happy to consider tidying it up a bit and using a more recognized
> form of licence. Just had a bank holiday here, so bug not yet squashed. But
> it is the sort of bug that might account for what you've seen (if a similar
> bug exists in the code you've been using). The tree doesn't always get
> properly rebalanced on node removals. I'll attack the problem later
> tomorrow (technically, later today). Cheers.
>

I'd prefer Apache or MIT or BSD 3-clause, but I could probably work with
this.
http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/eupl/news/licence-proliferation-way-out

I'm eager to see the code, and would love it if you sorted out the deletion
rebalance issue.

I just plunked some time into
https://github.com/headius/redblack/blob/master/red_black_tree.py , only to
find that it didn't appear to be doing deletions correctly - the tree would
become unprintable after deleting one element.  It's possible I introduced
the bug, but right now I don't particularly suspect so, having not changed
the __del__ method.

I'm starting to think Red Black Trees are pretty complex.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Red Black Tree implementation? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 16:11 -0700
  Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-02 03:06 +0100
    Re: Red Black Tree implementation? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 19:00 -0700
      Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-07 01:55 +0100
        Re: Red Black Tree implementation? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 11:21 +1000
        Re: Red Black Tree implementation? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 18:20 -0700
          Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-07 14:28 +0100
          Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-09 00:21 +0100
            Re: Red Black Tree implementation? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 18:40 -0700
              Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-09 05:31 +0100
              Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-09 14:52 +0100
                Re: Red Black Tree implementation? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-05-11 16:24 -0700
                Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-12 02:34 +0100
                Re: Red Black Tree implementation? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2013-05-11 18:29 -0700
                Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-12 03:02 +0100
                Re: Red Black Tree implementation? duncan smith <buzzard@invalid.invalid> - 2013-05-12 19:15 +0100

csiph-web