Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #77660
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: __qualname__ in python 3.3 |
| Date | 2014-09-06 20:11 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <540b3293$0$2056$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <mailman.13836.1410022089.18130.python-list@python.org> <540b3fe4$0$2055$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13840.1410027079.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
ISE Development wrote: > Peter Otten wrote: > >> ISE Development wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> When a class is defined within a function, the class generation >>> function's '__qualname__' attrbute is not qualified a name. >>> >>> For instance: >>> >>> def test(): >>> class T: >>> def method(self): >>> pass >>> t = T() >>> t.method() >>> >>> When tracing a call to 'test()' using 'sys.settrace()', extracting the >>> 'code' object from the frames of 'call' events and matching it to a >>> 'function' object (using 'gc.get_referrers()') results in the following: >>> >>> 'code' object 'function' object >>> ---------------- ------------------------------------ >>> co_name: test __qualname__: test >>> co_name: T __qualname__: T >>> co_name: method __qualname__: test.<locals>.T.method >>> >>> The second call corresponds to the class definition and not the call to >>> the constructor (which is in fact a call to 'object.__init__', a C >>> function hence not traced as a 'call' event - I checked this by >>> disassembling the code object). >>> >>> I would expect the second call's '__qualname__' to be 'test.<locals>.T'. >>> Can this be considered a bug? If so, I'll open one. >> >> I don't understand what you are doing, so I tried to reproduce the >> unqualified class name in 3.4 with the simpler approach of returning T: >> >> Python 3.4.0 (default, Apr 11 2014, 13:05:11) >> [GCC 4.8.2] on linux >> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>>> def test(): >> ... class T: >> ... def method(self): pass >> ... return T >> ... >>>>> T = test() >>>>> T.__qualname__ >> 'test.<locals>.T' >>>>> T.method.__qualname__ >> 'test.<locals>.T.method' >> >> If you do it that way with 3.3 (I don't have it handy) do you still see >> T instead of test.<locals>.T? > > Python 3.3 behaves in the same way in that case. > > This following shows the behaviour I am referring to: > > import gc > import sys > import inspect > > def global_trace(frame,event,arg): > if event == 'call': > code = frame.f_code > funcs = [obj for obj in gc.get_referrers(code) > if inspect.isfunction(obj)] > if len(funcs) == 1: > f = funcs[0] > print(f.__qualname__) > > def test(): > class C: > def method(self): > self > c = C() > c.method() > > sys.settrace(global_trace) > try: > test() > finally: > sys.settrace(None) > > which produces: > > test > C > test.<locals>.C.method OK, I get the same output in Python 3.4. That C seems to be an internal function that helps build the class test.<locals>.C, and I have no expectations as to its name. If anything I'd use something completely different, _init_namespace_C, say. I'm sorry I am not familiar enough with Python's internals to answer your question -- but if in doubt, file a report.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
__qualname__ in python 3.3 ISE Development <isenntp@gmail.com> - 2014-09-06 18:13 +0200
Re: __qualname__ in python 3.3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-09-06 18:47 +0200
Re: __qualname__ in python 3.3 ISE Development <isenntp@gmail.com> - 2014-09-06 19:09 +0200
Re: __qualname__ in python 3.3 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-09-06 20:11 +0200
Re: __qualname__ in python 3.3 Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> - 2014-09-07 13:03 +0000
Re: __qualname__ in python 3.3 ISE Development <isenntp@gmail.com> - 2014-09-08 00:25 +0200
csiph-web