Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #30118

Re: new-style class or old-style class?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'classes,': 0.05; 'classes.': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'considered,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'classes:': 0.16; 'code?': 0.16; 'descriptors,': 0.16; 'inheritance': 0.16; 'new-style': 0.16; 'old-style': 0.16; 'properties,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'simplified': 0.16; 'still,': 0.16; 'subject:class': 0.16; 'trivially': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'widely': 0.17; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; '-0700,': 0.29; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'yes.': 0.29; 'skip:_ 10': 0.29; 'classes': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; 'not.': 0.32; 'correctly.': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'thanks': 0.34; 'awesome': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'correctly': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'future.': 0.62; 'needing': 0.62; 'advantages': 0.71; 'delegation': 0.84; 'pain': 0.84; 'reminder,': 0.84; 'received:2': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: new-style class or old-style class?
Date Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:45:37 +0100
References <2e8a9e88-9e7e-43f7-a070-ea9054e625f2@googlegroups.com> <5061d9db$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-2-97-76-241.as13285.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
In-Reply-To <5061d9db$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
X-Antivirus avast! (VPS 120925-0, 25/09/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1366.1348598713.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 41
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1348598713 news.xs4all.nl 6948 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41492
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:30118

Show key headers only | View raw


On 25/09/2012 17:20, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:44:04 -0700, Jayden wrote:
>
>> In learning Python, I found there are two types of classes? Which one
>> are widely used in new Python code?
>
> New-style classes.
>
>> Is the new-style much better than old-style?
>
> Yes.
>
> Always use new-style classes, unless you have some specific reason for
> needing old-style ("classic") classes.
>
> Advantages of new-style classes:
>
> 1) They are the future. In Python 3, all classes are "new-style" and
> classic classes are gone.
>
> 2) Multiple inheritance works correctly. Multiple inheritance for classic
> classes is buggy.
>
> 3) New-style classes support awesome features like super(), properties,
> descriptors, and __getattribute__. Old-style do not.
>
> The main disadvantage is that automatic delegation is a pain to do
> correctly in new-style classes, but trivially simple in classic classes.
> Still, all things considered, it's a good trade.
>
>
>

Thanks for this reminder, my port of the J word code to Python has just 
been simplified :)

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

new-style class or old-style class? Jayden <jayden.shui@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 07:44 -0700
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-09-25 09:02 -0600
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-26 01:05 +1000
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-25 16:20 +0000
    Re: new-style class or old-style class? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 19:45 +0100
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-25 12:33 -0400
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-09-26 05:59 -0700
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-09-26 09:12 -0400
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2012-09-26 13:15 -0700
    Re: new-style class or old-style class? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-26 17:30 -0700

csiph-web