Re: new-style class or old-style class?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<tyler@tysdomain.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.010
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.98; 'S': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'python': 0.09; 'code?': 0.16; 'from:addr:tyler': 0.16; 'from:addr:tysdomain.com': 0.16; 'from:name:littlefield, tyler': 0.16; 'message-id:@tysdomain.com': 0.16; 'new-style': 0.16; 'received:69.164': 0.16; 'received:69.164.206': 0.16; 'received:69.164.206.65': 0.16; 'received:tds-solutions.net': 0.16; 'subject:class': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'widely': 0.17; 'received:192.168.1.100': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'project:': 0.29; 'url:code': 0.29; 'url:python': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'url:docs': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'url:p': 0.63; 'light-weight': 0.84; 'url:datamodel': 0.84; 'url:reference': 0.84; 'care,': 0.91
X-Spam-Checker-Version	SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wuff
X-Spam-Level
X-Spam-Status	No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Date	Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:02:00 -0600
From	"Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version	1.0
To	python-list@python.org
Subject	Re: new-style class or old-style class?
References	<2e8a9e88-9e7e-43f7-a070-ea9054e625f2@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To	<2e8a9e88-9e7e-43f7-a070-ea9054e625f2@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1342.1348585331.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	16
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1348585331 news.xs4all.nl 6843 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48546
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:30095

Show key headers only | View raw

On 9/25/2012 8:44 AM, Jayden wrote:
> In learning Python, I found there are two types of classes? Which one are widely used in new Python code? Is the new-style much better than old-style? Thanks!!


Perhaps this is useful:
http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html
It's 3.3 I think.

-- 
Take care,
Ty
http://tds-solutions.net
The aspen project: a barebones light-weight mud engine:
http://code.google.com/p/aspenmud
He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave.

Thread

new-style class or old-style class? Jayden <jayden.shui@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 07:44 -0700
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-09-25 09:02 -0600
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-09-26 01:05 +1000
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-25 16:20 +0000
    Re: new-style class or old-style class? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 19:45 +0100
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-25 12:33 -0400
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-09-26 05:59 -0700
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-09-26 09:12 -0400
  Re: new-style class or old-style class? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2012-09-26 13:15 -0700
    Re: new-style class or old-style class? alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-26 17:30 -0700

csiph-web