Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106581
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Promoting Python |
| Date | Thu, 7 Apr 2016 00:14:23 +1000 |
| Lines | 63 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.134.1459952066.32530.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <DUB110-DS131649FA6F6AA56BBDD63E989E0@phx.gbl> <mailman.54.1459840979.32530.python-list@python.org> <ne2qd3$8rg$1@dont-email.me> <87h9ffgdtr.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <ne348r$f5b$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmrCbA5UDW9tMVndw2U4EZAn+PBpOL2wYVc=6Mpfee0_pg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de 8eqLRhAoJO94wKug9SA8GAWVn9OutFBajoGOgQ91/eEA== |
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'compiler': 0.05; '*not*': 0.07; 'emulate': 0.07; 'executable': 0.07; 'expressions': 0.07; 'plenty': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'essential.': 0.09; 'mutable': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'translate': 0.15; 'wed,': 0.15; 'variables': 0.15; '(either': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'assignments,': 0.16; 'brilliant': 0.16; 'cleanly': 0.16; 'elsewhere,': 0.16; 'experiments': 0.16; 'expressions,': 0.16; 'expressions.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'independent,': 0.16; 'intrinsic': 0.16; 'least.': 0.16; 'lend': 0.16; 'messy': 0.16; 'opposite': 0.16; 'pairs).': 0.16; 'participate.': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'syntactic': 0.16; 'those,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'variable': 0.18; 'language': 0.19; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'background.': 0.20; '(by': 0.22; "aren't": 0.22; 'rid': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'code.': 0.23; 'sets': 0.23; 'slightly': 0.23; 'implemented': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'feature': 0.24; "doesn't": 0.26; 'required.': 0.26; 'coding': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'mathematical': 0.27; 'regular': 0.29; 'i/o': 0.29; 'if,': 0.29; 'understand,': 0.29; 'themselves': 0.29; 'classes': 0.30; 'that.': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'normally': 0.30; 'programmers': 0.30; 'push': 0.30; '[1]': 0.32; 'maybe': 0.33; 'getting': 0.33; 'accessible': 0.33; 'languages': 0.34; 'that,': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'so,': 0.35; 'functions.': 0.35; "isn't": 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'basic': 0.36; 'flow': 0.36; 'notes': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'say': 0.37; 'received:209.85.213': 0.37; 'seem': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.38; 'means': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'some': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.61; 'url:t': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'more.': 0.63; 'intent': 0.66; 'eight': 0.72; 'evaluate': 0.72; 'transfer': 0.73; 'actually,': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'console,': 0.84; 'paradox': 0.84; 'proves': 0.84; 'unnecessary,': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; '*for': 0.91; 'simulation': 0.91; 'url:youtu': 0.91; 'have.': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=5vMEeEY4PdHkxQ3fDKbmfsVGmlz0oghA3SjNYixQNnA=; b=mjBqdBu1TKTtyLS6XAvSFUPvai6fGhxZ9Ncea14NnaEbgonpGwNeWJard2oCAOrnyi XRbTK/JKCdYxb8IeFza5mbua35wzk7Bwepfu1vIX10EZBjyFdipeDUXcRq657cYUIkH8 eG5oltDNHS0bKBTMjRgb3fw7h8vtepjS97jj63xgoJDGy80rqhswu+1dkbR5Gev9HUdT +O/wKOF3TKdygphvOkQpD0Kh0ZSYCm10Z99s61NqVCjHKJWz3lk4Q561ycA95iozpmCa WQbfU5J9rzknwTycIEpvavracz5jLRja49UTbyI1KGDxw/SOorG1zJuI6ecxHewRIyun hI2A== |
| X-Google-DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=5vMEeEY4PdHkxQ3fDKbmfsVGmlz0oghA3SjNYixQNnA=; b=VJOGFc3mHLl7wPXmeaURAKYvwYhSwzKg8brq+zeN1ooJIoVWdJql1ZwcxKOYvZhGeP hJPIArx/gBbJyxMrMYUxL82HDCYoKfIDpAhFJeC0FUGlcb517ShBc/jnMRN260lYheQd FYXIiNM5VL2pnui2G1TiXZxcoPau3UfvLMG7FAp8HR5rmFO8IaDso157/PwgUrs403Br 3VjHkAiW/fMiwRi2U/Vue+kYhBzPg9p8iqzqainqkEcqWsS4VBQk2/IzPjHzuN+6Z/OX G73BVkjKa66m4mEvMEdqqzUb3mKxYXKxR9xp3JykgAlkg/5AgZuKT6Ai3CQNAfCAUIGu y21Q== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AD7BkJJVtyz5EseIIjGAXMZ5YlIgujUzIJEOx6pggm0dpjtboDvgKmaYD6bAoEpEevXUs5Nvs13WKixOhPG8Zg== |
| X-Received | by 10.50.124.36 with SMTP id mf4mr10281245igb.92.1459952063160; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:14:23 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <ne348r$f5b$1@dont-email.me> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.21 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <CAPTjJmrCbA5UDW9tMVndw2U4EZAn+PBpOL2wYVc=6Mpfee0_pg@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <DUB110-DS131649FA6F6AA56BBDD63E989E0@phx.gbl> <mailman.54.1459840979.32530.python-list@python.org> <ne2qd3$8rg$1@dont-email.me> <87h9ffgdtr.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <ne348r$f5b$1@dont-email.me> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:106581 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:54 PM, BartC <bc@freeuk.com> wrote: > There are plenty of features that /I/ consider must-have, which Python > doesn't have. It has to emulate them, unsatisfactorily, with variables or > classes or functions, or do without. Blub's Paradox epitomized. > But you're right in that little is actually essential. Basic has shown that. Actually, BASIC has a lot that isn't essential. A Turing-complete language can be implemented with just three tokens, although that's slightly cheating; they form eight opcodes (by being used in pairs). http://www.dangermouse.net/esoteric/ook.html > You need expressions, IF, GOTO, variables and assignments, and some means of > doing I/O. Depending on your meaning of "language", I would say that I/O does *not* have to be an intrinsic part of it - it can be implemented far more cleanly with built-in functions. Python 2 gave good syntactic support to printing to the console, and messy syntactic support to printing elsewhere, but Python 3 proved that it's not only unnecessary, but counter-productive - it's better to push that to regular functions. Technically, expressions aren't required. However, a modern imperative language will normally have expression support because it's so, well, expressive. Variable assignment, yes. And you need some form of flow control (either 'if' or 'while'). > Pretty much every language has (had) those, although it's fashionable now to > do away with GOTO, and some are getting rid of (rewritable) variables too! > Others seem intent on doing away with control flow altogether, just having > expressions. Apparently they think coding should become more elitist with > only mathematicians allowed to participate. > > I have the opposite view. Or maybe they think that coding should become more accessible to people with a strong mathematical background. There was a time when programming was a thing that only programmers did; that time is no more. A brilliant physicist who sets up synchrotron experiments should be able to learn enough Python to tinker with his simulation code; a mathematician who devises cryptographic algorithms should be able to transfer the algebraic notes directly into code. A language that makes it easier to translate algebra into executable code is *easier*, not harder, for those kinds of people. It might be harder *for you*, but that just proves that, once again, you don't like what you don't understand, and it scares you, and this feature is mysterious at least. [1] Also, languages with no mutable state and everything implemented as expressions lend themselves well to massive parallelization; the compiler can look at the code and see easily that these two subexpressions are entirely independent, and evaluate them in parallel. That's pretty powerful. Welcome to Blub's Paradox, once again. ChrisA [1] https://youtu.be/xCENkwPiuU0?t=1m59s
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Promoting Python "Gordon( Hotmail )" <sionet3344@hotmail.co.uk> - 2016-04-05 06:48 +0100
Re: Promoting Python Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 00:31 -0700
Re: Promoting Python Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:06 -0400
Re: Promoting Python alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-04-05 18:02 +0000
Re: Promoting Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-04-05 19:47 +0100
Re: Promoting Python alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-04-05 19:38 +0000
Re: Promoting Python Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 08:13 -0400
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-05 15:31 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-04-06 20:52 +1200
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 12:12 +0300
Re: Promoting Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-04-06 12:06 +0100
Re: Promoting Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-04-06 04:38 -0700
Re: Promoting Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-04-06 14:21 +0100
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 14:46 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 13:33 +0000
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 17:14 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 00:20 +1000
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 21:23 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 21:50 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 22:30 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 22:22 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 22:59 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 23:39 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-07 01:03 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-07 09:30 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 00:56 -0600
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-07 10:19 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-08 16:09 +1000
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 23:05 +0300
Re: Promoting Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-04-06 14:54 +0100
Re: Promoting Python Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-06 17:08 +0300
Re: Promoting Python Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:36 -0400
Re: Promoting Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 00:14 +1000
Re: Promoting Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-06 15:20 +0100
Re: Promoting Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-04-06 07:34 -0700
Re: Promoting Python Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-04-06 10:55 -0700
Re: Promoting Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-04-06 23:24 +0100
Re: Promoting Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-04-06 18:04 +0100
Re: Promoting Python Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-06 08:04 -0400
Re: Promoting Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-06 13:39 +0100
Re: Promoting Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-07 03:40 +1000
csiph-web