Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76744
| From | Joseph Martinot-Lagarde <joseph.martinot-lagarde@m4x.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Python vs C++ |
| Date | 2014-08-21 20:05 +0200 |
| References | <CAKUKWzmnnrpm-9SVNAFu3G9vYf2w0ewAhnGeOge8B2NsDujamQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmrO7fER7Wjgo6qNO9qHNJgkJ7Y3BFWBf1L=t-bOv4JV7w@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13255.1408644345.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Le 21/08/2014 15:40, Chris Angelico a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:54 PM, David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why to use C++ instead of python? >> >> This is, perhaps, a bit off-topic, but I really want to know the >> thoughts of experienced python programmers on it. > > No, it's a fair question. Why are we all here? > > The fact is, there's not a huge amount of reason left. If you're > linking against a C++ API, you may find it easiest to do the whole > program in C++, rather than use something like Cython (which, as far > as I'm aware, is C-only) or write a two-part project. And obviously if > you have an existing C++ codebase, then porting it has costs, and > maintaining it is probably better. But for the most part, I would > strongly recommend starting a project in a high level language like > Python unless there's a really compelling reason to do otherwise. C++ > has, of late, been growing a number of features that belong in higher > level languages; but if you want those sorts of features, why not just > grab Python or Pike or something and save yourself the trouble? For information, Cython works with C++ now: http://docs.cython.org/src/userguide/wrapping_CPlusPlus.html. Joseph
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python vs C++ Joseph Martinot-Lagarde <joseph.martinot-lagarde@m4x.org> - 2014-08-21 20:05 +0200
csiph-web