Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #111899

Re: Possible to capture cgitb style output in a try/except section?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Malcolm Greene <python@bdurham.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Possible to capture cgitb style output in a try/except section?
Date Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:52:47 -0400
Lines 25
Message-ID <mailman.131.1469548376.22221.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <1469527864.2996118.676987281.0EE8893F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <nn7qm9$uh2$1@ger.gmane.org> <1469548367.1451657.677295577.18F0D7FD@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de Uoug316imTGSYBSGOSA1eAZfNaIzF2vWU7P2fkT6ojxQ==
Return-Path <python@bdurham.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.009
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'handler': 0.04; '(python': 0.05; 'parameter.': 0.09; 'received:internal': 0.09; 'stringio': 0.09; 'output': 0.13; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'malcolm': 0.16; 'message-id:@webmail.messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:10.202': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2': 0.16; 'received:66.111': 0.16; 'received:66.111.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'appears': 0.23; 'import': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'helpful': 0.27; 'subject:/': 0.30; 'help!': 0.30; 'shorter': 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'difference': 0.38; 'received:66': 0.38; 'thank': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'default': 0.61; 'yourself': 0.73; 'peter,': 0.84; 'subject:Possible': 0.84; 'subject:try': 0.84; 'technique': 0.93
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bdurham.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=zrLupNfeFTzU84wDfn+3bBESkK0=; b=V3WfD1 8kdeAyCwisYssjcF4pvw1u1/hKEcZDBAH2chgboD32k70yeLbE21bzry3/qcGSg8 /FiXfiDNDJX3b17p3vgN2X5oUc4exrl8GO93aHHwmOGe1K7YIWFVEg63ElEfQDc4 DqidRDQatxdSzcFqY0Jea70asAJSgm5u5U/M0=
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=zrLupNfeFTzU84w Dfn+3bBESkK0=; b=RwkxAN0UDZZziJgEnkKKKAB7Ql6BpHH0nkanYNCIC2OzH/l 0L5M/cQv0Vh5qu2LsEBWkRQPXUxQuhqosfNN/d/dCxBh2KzFwCo4JVCZLdCALWmL arUjXPIoXqd1GI6kyrTh3rHOXTlo+MR2vrejucq2h5+AD/PHZ7SJ5Qqrq77U=
X-Sasl-Enc ExsfEAvYEnm/JrHmonl+K1IcimwEsqnntUu3osamf1PY 1469548367
X-Mailer MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3c2832c2
In-Reply-To <nn7qm9$uh2$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <1469548367.1451657.677295577.18F0D7FD@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <1469527864.2996118.676987281.0EE8893F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <nn7qm9$uh2$1@ger.gmane.org>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:111899

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi Steven and Peter,

Steven: Interestingly (oddly???) enough, the output captured by hooking
the cgitb handler on my system appears to be shorter than the default
cgitb output. You can see this yourself via this tiny script:

import cgitb
cgitb.enable(format='text')
x = 1/0

The solution I came up with (Python 3.5.1) was to use your StringIO
technique with the Hook's 'file=' parameter.

import io

cgitb_buffer = io.StringIO()
cgitb.Hook(file=cgitb_buffer, format='text)
return cgitb_buffer.getvalue()

Peter:  Your output was helpful in seeing the difference I mentioned
above.

Thank you both for your help!

Malcolm

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Possible to capture cgitb style output in a try/except section? Malcolm Greene <python@bdurham.com> - 2016-07-26 11:52 -0400

csiph-web