Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #89637
| References | <7f1dc7d2-2f88-4b1e-b3ae-bb67ae7e0028@googlegroups.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2015-04-30 10:21 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: mixing set and list operations |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.131.1430410904.3680.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Tim <jtim.arnold@gmail.com> wrote: > I noticed this today, using Python2.7 or 3.4, and wondered if it is implementation dependent: > > You can use 'extend' to add set elements to a list and use 'update' to add list elements to a set. It's not implementation dependent. Both methods are documented as accepting arbitrary iterables. The same is also true for the other foo_update set methods (and is generally true of built-ins). It is *not* true for the operator versions of the set methods, however (|, -, &, ^). It's also true for dict.update, except that in this case if an iterable is passed instead of a map, then each element of the iterable must be a 2-element iterable.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
mixing set and list operations Tim <jtim.arnold@gmail.com> - 2015-04-30 09:07 -0700
Re: mixing set and list operations Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-30 10:21 -0600
Re: mixing set and list operations Carl Meyer <carl@oddbird.net> - 2015-04-30 10:16 -0600
Re: mixing set and list operations Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-05-01 03:04 +1000
Re: mixing set and list operations Tim <jtim.arnold@gmail.com> - 2015-04-30 10:47 -0700
csiph-web