Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #38062

Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names

From dieter <dieter@handshake.de>
Subject Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names
Date 2013-02-02 09:03 +0100
References <CAM04Upt0HSYD5heSqACyfHZKYQ=CbobDEdQ5Zm-2St2qjUrcZA@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1287.1359792233.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Rhubarb Sin <rhubarbsin@gmail.com> writes:

> PEP-8 calls for "short, all-lowercase names" for packages:
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#package-and-module-names

This is mainly to support case insensitive file systems (and
file systems with quite limited path length).
With mixed case, some packages/modules may not conflict on
a case sensitive file system but happen to conflict on a
case insensitive file system.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: CamelCase vs. all-lowercase package names dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2013-02-02 09:03 +0100

csiph-web