Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #22607
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.009 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'value,': 0.04; 'lines.': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'if,': 0.09; 'tuple': 0.09; 'unpack': 0.09; 'cases': 0.14; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.18; 'wrote:': 0.19; 'explicit': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.24; 'leave': 0.26; 'embed': 0.28; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.30; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.30; 'skip:g 30': 0.30; 'chris': 0.31; 'received:209.85': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.32; 'received:209.85.210': 0.33; 'am,': 0.34; 'two': 0.35; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.35; 'received:209': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'item': 0.37; 'list,': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'instead': 0.38; 'skip:i 20': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; '...': 0.40; '2012': 0.62; 'cut': 0.65; 'directly.': 0.71; 'subject:this': 0.84; 'subject:better': 0.84; 'subject:there': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tcsqfYz0xHlsqplxaDDffGQRFdbiuzho9Q6ejGvI8vs=; b=g0QnUH3Ki7HJBJaFKA2wLqtekw5MJX8lfLfYIe0E8qFZV469x2IuoUyWKP+pFNQQwN ln3RJMqNqFOJJ3fdLjON9fLCBwEsfG5Hi0Fd9OsMrKh7TPJDONguiwhgQZRwYL8JV4My l0pw36bAFoFMQCDj/wNYSUNPpCj3dNszL97LXNWbFDJi9DV4ylVc1Ry0izkjdNTSzK9F aN3qB2bT1T6snjfAHr1waNSjoZ1RnIoqIj9fbhPGFo5oi5P0J9PH6WErdJip8t2jLL+y An0suL/qvpqbA76rIU8Zh2vBz8mupDyQd/etMGX1F9wtpcJKMzf5805rbZUTG9E1n3yX 4utw== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <52664090-0833-4ec2-af8b-326737dd67d1@w5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> |
| References | <52664090-0833-4ec2-af8b-326737dd67d1@w5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> |
| Date | Wed, 4 Apr 2012 01:09:35 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Is there a better way to do this snippet? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1280.1333465778.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 23 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1333465779 news.xs4all.nl 6950 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44166 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:22607 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:36 AM, python <w.g.sneddon@gmail.com> wrote: > for item in tag23gr: > ... value, key = tuple(item) > ... if(g23tag.get(key)): > ... g23tag[key].append(value) > ... else: > ... g23tag[key] = [value] Simple enhancement: Use setdefault. Instead of the if, just use: g23tag.setdefault(key,[]).append(value) That'll cover both cases in one. You can leave off the explicit tuple construction; if item is a two-element list, you can unpack it directly. You can also embed that straight into your for loop: for value,key in tag23gr: Do both and you cut your loop down to two lines. Cool! :) Chris Angelico
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there a better way to do this snippet? python <w.g.sneddon@gmail.com> - 2012-04-03 07:36 -0700
Re: Is there a better way to do this snippet? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-04-03 17:02 +0200
Re: Is there a better way to do this snippet? nn <pruebauno@latinmail.com> - 2012-04-03 08:37 -0700
Re: Is there a better way to do this snippet? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-04-03 18:26 +0200
Re: Is there a better way to do this snippet? nn <pruebauno@latinmail.com> - 2012-04-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Is there a better way to do this snippet? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-04-04 01:09 +1000
Re: Is there a better way to do this snippet? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-04-03 17:24 +0200
csiph-web