Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #110825
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions |
| Date | Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:25:20 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| Lines | 52 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.127.1467271548.2358.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <85mvm5vrbw.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.61.1467090177.2358.python-list@python.org> <0690f476-95ad-4dec-87e5-42ecee07fdcd@googlegroups.com> <nl2hh5$ar7$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de tbUwPAngzic9fRkSRG63ZQ/c7ylwLZGgeCP5UPrT/2nQ== |
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; '"""': 0.05; '*args,': 0.07; 'raises': 0.07; 'assigning': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'def': 0.13; 'argument': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'ah,': 0.16; 'foo():': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'programmers,': 0.16; 'readable': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'subject:parameters': 0.16; 'sugar': 0.16; 'syntactic': 0.16; 'tracebacks': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; 'explicit': 0.22; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'component': 0.23; 'somewhere': 0.24; 'module': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'wonder': 0.27; 'looks': 0.29; '**kwargs)': 0.29; 'improves': 0.29; 'it\xe2\x80\x99s': 0.29; 'allows': 0.30; 'foo': 0.33; 'instead': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'why': 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'subject:with': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'share': 0.61; 'provide': 0.61; 'side': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'eyes': 0.70; 'decorator:': 0.84; 'expressive': 0.84; 'suspicion': 0.84; 'understood.': 0.84; 'widespread': 0.91 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p57bd9781.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.13.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.22 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <nl2hh5$ar7$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <85mvm5vrbw.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.61.1467090177.2358.python-list@python.org> <0690f476-95ad-4dec-87e5-42ecee07fdcd@googlegroups.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:110825 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 5:03:08 PM UTC+12, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> I would like to see a more Pythonic, more explicit and expressive
>> replacement with its component parts easily understood.
>
> I don’t know why this fear and suspicion of lambdas is so widespread among
> Python users ... former Java/C# programmers, perhaps?
If there is "fear" I don't share it. However, for
foo = lambda <args>: <expr>
there is syntactic sugar in Python that allows you to write it as
def foo(<args>):
return <expr>
with the nice side effects that it improves the readability of tracebacks
and allows you to provide a docstring.
So yes, assigning a lambda to a name raises my "suspicion".
If a lambda is provided as an argument or as part of an expression I wonder
how it is tested, and if even if it is trivial like
def reduce(items, func=lambda x, y: x + y): ...
the alternative
def reduce(items, func=add): ...
looks more readable in my eyes even though somewhere -- under the rug or in
the operator module -- you need
def add(x, y):
"""
>>> add(3, 4)
7
"""
return x + y
>> decorator_with_args = lambda decorator: lambda *args, **kwargs:
lambda func: decorator(func, *args, **kwargs)
>
> Ah, I see why there are 3 lambdas, instead of 2. It’s so that you can
write
I have a suspicion that there would not have been a correction "I see why
there are three functions instead of two" ;)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-06-28 15:02 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-27 23:08 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-28 18:39 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-30 13:49 +1000
Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-30 09:25 +0200
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 00:43 -0700
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-30 18:00 +1000
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-30 10:41 +0200
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2016-07-01 09:04 +0200
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-01 21:25 +0100
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-02 11:52 +1000
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2016-07-02 08:57 +0200
Re: Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-02 18:00 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 19:50 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 15:08 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 23:09 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 23:40 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 22:48 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 22:37 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 05:52 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 14:17 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 16:38 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 16:25 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 09:39 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 16:59 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 10:06 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 18:01 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 17:06 -0700
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 18:20 -0600
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-02 15:32 +1000
Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 23:53 -0600
csiph-web