Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #95062

Re: QUEST: does HACKING make FOR loop quicker.

Path csiph.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder1.xsusenet.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.027
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'bye': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:make': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'originally': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'question': 0.27; 'post': 0.31; 'language.': 0.32; 'michael': 0.33; 'list,': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'mailing': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'john': 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'our': 0.64; 'tutor': 0.66; 'doe': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'subject:FOR': 0.95
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: QUEST: does HACKING make FOR loop quicker.
Date Thu, 6 Aug 2015 05:06:07 +0100
References <55C26B57.9080603@bk.ru> <mptvrp$ic$1@ger.gmane.org> <55C2AA5E.2000806@gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-78-147-183-8.as13285.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
In-Reply-To <55C2AA5E.2000806@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1265.1438834207.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 19
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1438834207 news.xs4all.nl 2945 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59229
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:95062

Show key headers only | View raw


On 06/08/2015 01:29, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 08/05/2015 03:39 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 05/08/2015 21:00, John Doe wrote:
>>
>> Three strikes and you're out, good bye troll.
>
> While the original post is incomprehensible to me, I see only one post.
>   What were the other two strikes?
>

Same question originally on the tutor mailing list, then the development 
mailing list.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: QUEST: does HACKING make FOR loop quicker. Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-06 05:06 +0100

csiph-web