Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #9896

Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.wiretrip.org!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.050
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Function': 0.09; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'pointed': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'tue,': 0.23; 'subject: -- ': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'fine.': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'difference': 0.34; 'whilst': 0.34; 'skip:" 10': 0.36; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85.161': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'yours': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ggBm2QKxMWScA3IWk5GI6BZ7APg4b2WLQDhj7hU2U9M=; b=RMzqrGqh/QtCeBzNP62d8MX8jcTxBMp8Zs20/i5ygZGS44gK8RTvhKXQT0AzNfm8HD VxzTQTzr9QTcwc+p8ImwC3uP/tEJGg0l2xUscS9rHBU2Y0zcArP/CmZiWwZVYfGNUquL 0uTFUwPjNuzwjwJ0sq6lb8yg4Ph7G68ie1FxM=
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <4E25B7B2.8000306@jollybox.de>
References <201107181543.42229.kurianmthayil@gmail.com> <CACNEfZaLVqY=HFvRGYbKMFxLtYBU0gLDmFfMguorJznDGOh=yA@mail.gmail.com> <j0239q$smp$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.1232.1311025576.1164.python-list@python.org> <1405042.q1RDiLHYyK@PointedEars.de> <4247181.bSrEuok8ZT@PointedEars.de> <4E25228C.6000705@jollybox.de> <CALwzidmugMS-1cuFBrTKdA=VKctC27r=CL3N7v_DH=a0qQK03Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E25B7B2.8000306@jollybox.de>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:15:23 -0600
Subject Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function?
To Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1262.1311095754.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 6
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1311095754 news.xs4all.nl 23954 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48398
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9896

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> wrote:
> No, it's not an improvement. It's an illustration.

I get that.  The difference I pointed out between your
"simplification" and the other Thomas's is the reason why yours would
be unpythonic whilst his is fine.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-07-18 17:45 -0400
  Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-19 00:28 +0200
    Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-19 00:33 +0200
      Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-19 08:22 +0200
      Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 10:49 -0600
      Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-19 18:58 +0200
      Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:15 -0600
    Re: Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-07-19 06:07 -0400
    Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-19 12:47 -0400

csiph-web