Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #20809
| Date | 2012-02-24 07:20 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Please verify!! |
| References | (1 earlier) <4F46C124.2070102@davea.name> <mailman.106.1330055156.3037.python-list@python.org> <87mx88tyvc.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.117.1330075122.3037.python-list@python.org> <4f47808b$0$29989$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.126.1330089661.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2/24/2012 6:20 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Opinions need to be informed to be better than useless. By definition > newbies don't have the experience to have informed opinions. I thought I had implied that I meant informed opinions, but apparently not. > There are many times that we can't afford to sit on the fence. Lacking > experience to decide between spaces and tabs, we can't just say "I won't > use either", or "I'll use both" (unless you do so in separate files). So > how can we make a decision? > > The usual way is to listen to others, who do have the experience to make > a decision (even if only imperfectly). But you've just told us off for > passing on our experience/opinions to newbies, so in effect you're saying > that people shouldn't learn from the experiences of others. I don't mean that no one should ever give an opinion. Saying you prefer spaces because you've had to deal with broken editors that don't handle tabs well is quite different from saying an editor is wrong/broken if it isn't using space-tabs. Giving an opinion and presenting an argument are perfectly fine; I don't agree with calling things inherently wrong if they aren't what you prefer. I had (and have) no problem with Dave preferring spaces and giving reasons. I have a problem with him implying that editors should always use space-tabs and never real tabs, especially in the context of this thread. -- CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Please verify!! Manish Sharma <manish2aug@gmail.com> - 2012-02-23 14:13 -0800
Re: Please verify!! Ben <bungiman@gmail.com> - 2012-02-23 14:29 -0800
Re: Please verify!! Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-02-23 17:43 -0500
Re: Please verify!! Joshua Miller <milleja46@gmail.com> - 2012-02-23 20:57 -0500
Re: Please verify!! Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-02-23 21:45 -0600
Re: Please verify!! Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-02-24 19:32 +1100
Re: Please verify!! Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-02-24 03:18 -0600
Re: Please verify!! Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-02-24 12:20 +0000
Re: Please verify!! Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-02-24 07:20 -0600
Re: Please verify!! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-02-25 07:41 +1100
Re: Please verify!! Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-25 00:49 +0000
Re: Please verify!! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-02-25 12:25 +1100
Re: Please verify!! Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-02-24 21:36 -0500
Re: Please verify!! Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-24 11:21 +0000
Re: Please verify!! Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-02-24 05:36 -0600
Re: Please verify!! Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-02-24 01:26 -0600
Re: Please verify!! Jugurtha Hadjar <jugurtha.hadjar@gmail.com> - 2012-02-24 12:10 +0100
csiph-web