Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #9888

Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:verizon.net': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; '>>>>': 0.09; 'changed;': 0.09; 'deliberately': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'statement.': 0.09; 'subject:Function': 0.09; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'pm,': 0.16; '>>>': 0.16; 'def': 0.16; 'jan': 0.19; 'posting': 0.21; 'so.': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'subject: -- ': 0.25; 'testing': 0.25; 'saying': 0.26; "i'm": 0.27; 'do.': 0.30; 'colon': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'changes': 0.31; "skip:' 10": 0.32; 'too': 0.32; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.34; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.34; 'couple': 0.34; 'agree': 0.35; 'statement,': 0.35; 'addresses': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'two': 0.38; 'header:Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'got': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'factory': 0.73; '02:59': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'typos': 0.84; 'mistakes': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function?
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:47:14 -0400
References <201107181543.42229.kurianmthayil@gmail.com> <CACNEfZaLVqY=HFvRGYbKMFxLtYBU0gLDmFfMguorJznDGOh=yA@mail.gmail.com> <j0239q$smp$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.1232.1311025576.1164.python-list@python.org> <1405042.q1RDiLHYyK@PointedEars.de> <4E25576E.6050300@ieee.org>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host pool-74-109-121-73.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
In-Reply-To <4E25576E.6050300@ieee.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1259.1311094202.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 29
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1311094202 news.xs4all.nl 23957 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55534
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9888

Show key headers only | View raw


On 7/19/2011 6:07 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Dave Angel wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>>> def makeadder(y)
>>>> def _add(x): return x+y
>>>> add2 = makeadder(2)
>>> A couple of typos in that code:
>>>
>>>
>>> def makeaddr(y):
>>> def _add(x): return x+y
>>> return _add
>> I agree about the `return' statement, but not about the factory name;
>> this
>> has nothing to do with addresses (addr).
>>
>
> The two changes that I made deliberately were adding the colon and
> adding the return statement. I'm not sure how the name got changed; that
> was accidental.

Anyway, my apologies for posting quickly without testing and without 
saying so. I know better and too often leave in mistakes when I do.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-07-18 17:45 -0400
  Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-19 00:28 +0200
    Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-19 00:33 +0200
      Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-19 08:22 +0200
      Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 10:49 -0600
      Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-19 18:58 +0200
      Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:15 -0600
    Re: Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-07-19 06:07 -0400
    Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-19 12:47 -0400

csiph-web