Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9889
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.007 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'bind': 0.09; 'subject:Function': 0.09; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; '12:22': 0.16; 'def.': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'simplified': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'anonymous': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python- list': 0.16; 'def': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'tue,': 0.23; 'subject: -- ': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'construct': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'functions.': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85.161': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'should': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'making': 0.66; 'subject:over': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=DfvpiuxXY/dfaed64B7vUnu12CaSL64UrSxcyx8Zrts=; b=CJu0QTnhVNrOWYCdBbwNWjQXVbO9N0rIHtYyMT9zaWAh5ezAzRQhZMoYx7RHBFMMbq sufuUV+x1QdL2vbgDgYQX0af7Kb+n+B4jzbMkdSv44dXlVYsW6+103FhrP8A5K2iifiC dyvpWPNuWfGiIw9YcZLXUkm3Lhvo8giHQMJI4= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <4E25228C.6000705@jollybox.de> |
| References | <201107181543.42229.kurianmthayil@gmail.com> <CACNEfZaLVqY=HFvRGYbKMFxLtYBU0gLDmFfMguorJznDGOh=yA@mail.gmail.com> <j0239q$smp$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.1232.1311025576.1164.python-list@python.org> <1405042.q1RDiLHYyK@PointedEars.de> <4247181.bSrEuok8ZT@PointedEars.de> <4E25228C.6000705@jollybox.de> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:49:00 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? |
| To | Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1258.1311094174.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 13 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1311094174 news.xs4all.nl 23957 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55220 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9889 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> wrote: >> Supplemental: The above can be simplified to >> >> def makeadder(y): return lambda x: x + y >> > > In turn: > > makeadder = lambda y: lambda x: x + y That's not an improvement. lambda is for making anonymous functions. If you're going to construct a lambda and bind it to a name, you should just use def.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-07-18 17:45 -0400
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-19 00:28 +0200
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-19 00:33 +0200
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-19 08:22 +0200
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 10:49 -0600
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-19 18:58 +0200
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:15 -0600
Re: Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-07-19 06:07 -0400
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-19 12:47 -0400
csiph-web