Re: QUEST: does HACKING make FOR loop quicker.

Path	csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<joel.goldstick@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.052
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.90; 'S': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'wed,': 0.15; 'bye': 0.16; 'received:mail- ig0-x22a.google.com': 0.16; 'subject:make': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'first.': 0.18; '2015': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'aug': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'second': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'post': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.33; 'michael': 0.33; 'url:listinfo': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'john': 0.61; 'repeat': 0.67; 'doe': 0.84; 'joel': 0.91; 'subject:FOR': 0.95
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SVvbmClftE6g4YUqgjDxJVluGqoXRZ1hG0koMLA637A=; b=vkNl4+VvarpFNEZCKrnQ1Rgpv3c/WELOastMvqDFkJgd6inO1+4VTya/9h/2U+Cb1J rYoiCcMwXk1d/gFlKZZRKUuSHgnp0pyXtbJFvDbDWYwXxKfm4IB8k3TYLsezizgUfjU5 aBscog5ac66PYiA8LHPKcggl1gFO0RQmxfM4y228CHL/cDpokGsve7ujrJlEr41y1gRu +Oe+bFxPh/CLJYxaUMhsMMuIS8TWTow2dB3B9w67Y23datR/TVhVfET/hz+gdCmcL33b fGCVBW87esyBanPx8jYVPXro49sDgg6LE9WoGvNn3yGPD//UqqQmQD+vZv0GuBpX27cn scjw==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.50.78.68 with SMTP id z4mr430509igw.51.1438821778489; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<55C2AA5E.2000806@gmail.com>
References	<55C26B57.9080603@bk.ru> <mptvrp$ic$1@ger.gmane.org> <55C2AA5E.2000806@gmail.com>
Date	Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:42:58 -0400
Subject	Re: QUEST: does HACKING make FOR loop quicker.
From	Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com>
To	Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Cc	"python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.20+
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1254.1438821786.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	17
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1438821786 news.xs4all.nl 2829 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44386
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:95047

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/05/2015 03:39 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 05/08/2015 21:00, John Doe wrote:
>>
>> Three strikes and you're out, good bye troll.
>
> While the original post is incomprehensible to me, I see only one post.
>  What were the other two strikes?
>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

I count 2, but the second is the repeat of the first.

-- 
Joel Goldstick
http://joelgoldstick.com

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: QUEST: does HACKING make FOR loop quicker. Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 20:42 -0400

csiph-web