Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9870
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <SRS0=aRKV=2G=ieee.org=davea@srs.perfora.net> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.020 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'terry': 0.07; 'changed;': 0.09; 'deliberately': 0.09; 'statement.': 0.09; 'subject:Function': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'pm,': 0.16; '>>>': 0.16; 'def': 0.16; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'subject: -- ': 0.25; "i'm": 0.27; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'colon': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'changes': 0.31; "skip:' 10": 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'couple': 0.34; 'agree': 0.35; 'statement,': 0.35; 'addresses': 0.36; 'cc:2**1': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'two': 0.38; 'received:192.168.1': 0.39; 'got': 0.39; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'factory': 0.73; '02:59': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'typos': 0.84 |
| Date | Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:07:42 -0400 |
| From | Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de> |
| Subject | Re: Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? |
| References | <201107181543.42229.kurianmthayil@gmail.com> <CACNEfZaLVqY=HFvRGYbKMFxLtYBU0gLDmFfMguorJznDGOh=yA@mail.gmail.com> <j0239q$smp$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.1232.1311025576.1164.python-list@python.org> <1405042.q1RDiLHYyK@PointedEars.de> |
| In-Reply-To | <1405042.q1RDiLHYyK@PointedEars.de> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Provags-ID | V02:K0:+8Qla6xdIN/o1eQ3mpihz7VLiSH17eDEQNZo3+Zc+3r sDEFuKugUQs1pNF4zVazBF/UANPojqFBKvyMOVmBgbWa3Ur22A Osm8d4mhaoDwlfEd0V4xzE+0bAY4YoxAryQChYTtqy/LQPhl+P Ng6jN0s12qKj/bpcWXTZ1Nq1OAg+mbgplzeDs9JL1i2pP/C8Qv jt7ZW+SSVVS88y3wLrJTA== |
| Cc | python-list@python.org, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| Reply-To | davea@ieee.org |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1246.1311070085.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 23 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1311070085 news.xs4all.nl 23894 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56966 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9870 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Dave Angel wrote: > >> On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: >>> def makeadder(y) >>> def _add(x): return x+y >>> add2 = makeadder(2) >> A couple of typos in that code: >> >> >> def makeaddr(y): >> def _add(x): return x+y >> return _add > I agree about the `return' statement, but not about the factory name; this > has nothing to do with addresses (addr). > The two changes that I made deliberately were adding the colon and adding the return statement. I'm not sure how the name got changed; that was accidental. DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-07-18 17:45 -0400
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-19 00:28 +0200
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-07-19 00:33 +0200
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-19 08:22 +0200
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 10:49 -0600
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-19 18:58 +0200
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 11:15 -0600
Re: Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Dave Angel <davea@ieee.org> - 2011-07-19 06:07 -0400
Re: Partial Function Application -- Advantages over normal function? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-19 12:47 -0400
csiph-web