Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #88631

Re: Code critique please

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <cameron@cskk.homeip.net>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'languages.': 0.04; 'importing': 0.05; 'output': 0.05; 'sys': 0.07; '(instead': 0.09; '__name__': 0.09; 'caller': 0.09; 'etc).': 0.09; 'image,': 0.09; 'pil': 0.09; 'pixels': 0.09; 'trailing': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'wrote': 0.14; 'anyway': 0.14; 'creates': 0.14; '"&"': 0.16; '%r"': 0.16; "'__main__':": 0.16; '(0,': 0.16; '(1,': 0.16; '(without': 0.16; '.py': 0.16; 'accident.': 0.16; 'bitwise': 0.16; 'bryan': 0.16; 'byte,': 0.16; 'coord': 0.16; 'elements,': 0.16; 'emit': 0.16; 'from:addr:cs': 0.16; 'from:addr:zip.com.au': 0.16; 'from:name:cameron simpson': 0.16; 'message-id:@cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'png': 0.16; 'popping': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'said.': 0.16; 'sees': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'skip:> 20': 0.16; 'sys.stderr': 0.16; 'terribly': 0.16; 'think.': 0.16; 'value;': 0.16; 'weekend.': 0.16; 'y):': 0.16; 'exception': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; '(where': 0.19; 'file,': 0.19; 'normally': 0.19; 'later': 0.20; 'not,': 0.20; 'example': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'issue.': 0.22; 'otherwise,': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'error': 0.23; '"you': 0.24; 'byte': 0.24; 'flows': 0.24; 'laws': 0.24; 'script.': 0.24; 'skip': 0.24; 'subject:Code': 0.24; 'tend': 0.24; 'cheers,': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'extension': 0.26; 'this:': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; 'values': 0.27; 'gets': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'wondering': 0.29; '(this': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; 'generally': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; 'subject:please': 0.30; 'program,': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; "skip:' 10": 0.31; 'end,': 0.31; 'file:': 0.31; 'img': 0.31; 'invoke': 0.31; 'origin': 0.31; 'os,': 0.31; 'pos': 0.31; 'allows': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'probably': 0.32; 'becomes': 0.33; 'programmers': 0.33; 'actual': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'etc': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'operations': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'representing': 0.36; 'skip:> 10': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'changing': 0.37; 'turn': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'handle': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'short': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'entire': 0.61; 'content-disposition:inline': 0.62; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'happen': 0.63; 'myself': 0.63; 'become': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'here': 0.66; '>from': 0.68; 'below.': 0.71; 'funny': 0.74; 'friend': 0.79; 'forth': 0.81; 'directed': 0.83; 'low': 0.83; 'avoids': 0.84; 'bare': 0.84; 'blow': 0.84; 'received:192.168.15': 0.84; 'standing': 0.84; 'want:': 0.84; 'destination': 0.91; 'write:': 0.91
Date Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:49:18 +1000
From Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Code critique please
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition inline
In-Reply-To <53f4c2fd-a20c-4d09-8719-8f3f9b80670b@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
References <53f4c2fd-a20c-4d09-8719-8f3f9b80670b@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.124.1428450564.12925.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 167
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1428450564 news.xs4all.nl 2926 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59226
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:88631

Show key headers only | View raw


On 07Apr2015 15:43, kai.peters@gmail.com <kai.peters@gmail.com> wrote:
>I just wrote this bit (coming from Pascal) and am wondering how seasoned Python programmers would have done the same? Anything terribly non-python?
>
>As always, thanks for all input.
>K
>
>"""
> Creates a PNG image from EPD file
>"""
>
>import os, sys
>from PIL import Image, ImageFont, ImageDraw
>
># -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>def RenderByte(draw, byte, x, y):
>    blist = list(bin(byte).lstrip('0b')) # turn byte into list with 8 elements,

Remark: .lstrip does not do what you think.
You want:

    blist = list(bin(byte)[2:]) # turn byte into list with 8 elements,

to skip over the leading "0b". Otherwise, with lstrip, consider what would 
happen with a low value byte, with multiple leading zeroes. (Actually, on 
reflection, you might get away with it - but probably not, and anyway would be 
fragile against changing the ordering of the bits.)

I'd be popping off the least or most siginificant bit myself with "&" and "<<" 
or ">>". It might be wordier, bit it would be more in keeping with the actual 
bitwise operations going on.

>    c = 0                                # each representing one bit
>    for bit in blist:
>        if bit:
>            draw.point((x + c, y), fcolor)
>        c += 1

This might be more Pythonic written:

  for c, bit in enumerate(blist):

which will emit (0, b0), (1, b1) and so forth for bit 0, bit 1 etc (where bit 0 
is the leftmost from your list, etc). Avoids the "c = 0" and the "c += 1" and 
also makes your loop robust against adding control flows later which might skip 
the final "c += 1" at the end, even by accident.

>    return

You generally do not need a trailing return with no value; it is implicit.

>def EPD_2_Image(edpfilename, imagefilename):
>    # get out of here if EPD file not present
>    if not os.path.isfile(epdfilename):
>        print 'file not found: ' + edpfilename
>        return

Traditionally one would raise an exception instead of returning. Eg:

  if not os.path.isfile(epdfilename):
    raise ValueError("missing file: %r" % (epdfilename,))

and have the caller handle the issue. Similarly for all the other pre-checks 
below.

Also, it is normal for error messages to be directed to sys.stderr (this allows 
them to be logged independently of the program's normal output; for example the 
normal output might be sent to a file, but the error messages would continue to 
be displayed on screen). So were you to iussue a print statement (instead of an 
exception) you would write:

  print >>sys.stderr, ....

or in Python 3:

  print(...., file=sys.stderr)

>    # is this a valid EPD file?
>    filesize = os.path.getsize(epdfilename)
>    if (((xdim / 8) * ydim) + header) <> filesize:
>        print 'incorrect file size: ' + edpfilename
>        return
>
>    # blow old destination file away
>    if os.path.isfile(imagefilename):
>        print 'deleting old dest. file: ' + imagefilename
>        os.remove(imagefilename)
>
>    print 'processing...'
>
>    # set up PIL objects
>    img  = Image.new('1', (xdim, ydim), bcolor)   # '1' = Bi-tonal image
>    draw = ImageDraw.Draw(img)
>
>    # read entire EPD file into byte array (without the header)
>    content = bytearray(open(epdfilename, 'rb').read())[16:]
>
>    # image coord origin at top/left according to PIL documentation
>    pos = 0
>    for y in range(ydim):
>        x = 0
>        for byte in range(xdim / 8):   # 8 pixels 'stuffed' into one byte
>            RenderByte(draw, content[pos], x, y)
>            pos += 1
>            x   += 8
>
>    img.save(imagefilename)   # format is inferred from given extension
>    print 'done.'
>
>    return

Again, this "return" can be implicit.

># -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>xdim   = 1024
>ydim   = 1280
>header = 16
>black  = 0
>white  = 1
>bcolor = black
>fcolor = white
>
>epdfilename   = 'c:\\temp\\drawtest2.epd'
>imagefilename = 'c:\\temp\\drawtest2.png'

Normally these values would be at the top of your program, and named in 
UPPER_CASE to indicate that they are like "constants" in other languages. So 
you might put this:

  XDIM   = 1024
  YDIM   = 1280
  HEADER_SIZE = 16
  BLACK  = 0
  WHITE  = 1
  BCOLOR = BLACK
  FCOLOR = WHITE

  EPD_FILENAME   = 'c:\\temp\\drawtest2.epd'
  IMAGE_FILENAME = 'c:\\temp\\drawtest2.png'

at the top of the script.

I notice you have a bare [16:] in your "content =" line. Should that not say 
"[HEADER_SIZE:]" ?

>EPD_2_Image(epdfilename, imagefilename)

I tend to write things like this as thought they could become python modules 
for reuse. (Often they do; why write something twice?)

So the base of the script becomes like this:

if __name__ == '__main__':
  EPD_2_Image(EPD_FILENAME, IMAGE_FILENAME)

In this way, when you invoke the .py file directly __name__ is "__main__" and 
your function gets run. But it you move this all into a module which may be 
imported, __name__ will be the module name, an so not invoke the main function.  
The importing code can then do so as it sees fit.

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>

I heard a funny one this weekend.  I was belaying a friend on a very short
problem and when she was pumped out she told me to "Let me down" and my
other friend that was standing nearby said.  "You were never UP!".
        - Bryan Laws <bryanlaws@aol.com>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Code critique please kai.peters@gmail.com - 2015-04-07 15:43 -0700
  Re: Code critique please Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 17:25 -0600
  Re: Code critique please Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2015-04-07 16:38 -0700
  Re: Code critique please Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2015-04-08 09:49 +1000
  Re: Code critique please kai.peters@gmail.com - 2015-04-07 16:51 -0700
  Re: Code critique please Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-04-08 01:54 +0100
  Re: Code critique please Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 13:25 +0100
  Re: Code critique please Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-04-09 12:26 +0200

csiph-web