Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #44618
| Date | 2013-05-02 12:46 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: Red Black Tree implementation? |
| References | <CAGGBd_rsM7LVd_V=Xb64vqeXmYCx2uxAnQfJo3MsHXJOphzJBQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1229.1367491610.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Am 02.05.2013 01:11, schrieb Dan Stromberg: > > What's the best Red Black Tree implementation for Python with an > opensource license? > > I started out looking at > http://newcenturycomputers.net/projects/rbtree.html > <http://newcenturycomputers.net/projects/rbtree..html> because it was > pretty high in Google and had the operators I wanted, but it gets very > slow at about half a million elements. I've been discussing this with a > C programmer who believes that Red Black Trees should perform very > similarly to an AVL tree, but that's not at all what I'm getting with > the newcenturycomputers implementation. No wonder it's getting slow and doesn't stand a change against Python's dict implementation. The rbtree implementation from newcenturycomputers.net is written entirely in Python. It's good code for academic research in order to study the properties of a rbtree. If you need something production ready then you have to use an implemetation with an optimized backend like a C code, PyPy or Cython. Christian
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Red Black Tree implementation? Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2013-05-02 12:46 +0200
csiph-web