Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #87047
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.160 |
| X-Spam-Level | * |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.69; '*S*': 0.01; 'algorithm': 0.04; 'extension.': 0.16; 'manageable': 0.16; 'subject:generation': 0.16; 'elements': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'pointed': 0.19; 'written': 0.21; 'now?': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'room': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'url:python': 0.33; 'fri,': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'doubt': 0.36; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'though,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; "you'll": 0.62; 'more': 0.64; 'mar': 0.68; 'yourself': 0.78; '100': 0.79; 'age': 0.80; '2015': 0.84; '9.6': 0.84; 'hundred': 0.95 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=22vIPa8XAh+9za6YZkVkRJuaa4fncYYwFy0fKr/WxYQ=; b=PXktDCeM2geEjAC9WqmMhN9U1a5HBvRxDcPHdRkvM8p+YGbbP26UzvSUXcQcmNcWM/ 1zQ2g6LKP9hhAt/iYd6ECvLddZ1qQON8L2vV3/pkrA9rAu2yrXxrQA8ozPFZIql/Q5ah lQVmhnCMF+96yGdAIXKs5ekUEyOo5Jrk+Hui3bf82TJuDGTBPWAWHuinfKdzxVW5SDi9 a6EiZgo5kSrryUqqZqcoqSmmHiBueAEt1qF2cle5qbBp7TkiF+1JSqJCeXHMdVHYj2VV GTP2KuRzhtaU64tGzo1rzQINdssA/5lmWkI0Wkjkd6OwaWMjMKrKCQN80qHUkb1GIXDa jrMg== |
| X-Received | by 10.66.221.194 with SMTP id qg2mr27546312pac.106.1425662045784; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:14:05 -0800 (PST) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CADgpKWaJkyO8yCPmTSphGjPBaCWcNUpJOwDdb7tJ-hNHPTMf4A@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <CADgpKWb=q2=YEJSS1yRkgzF37nO5BNRnywm+zhcwF-MAOr6MdA@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzid=O96Jd_bwwgxOuswmW9ucoFh=4Ht1P1Msrb7POZij__w@mail.gmail.com> <CADgpKWaJkyO8yCPmTSphGjPBaCWcNUpJOwDdb7tJ-hNHPTMf4A@mail.gmail.com> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:13:25 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Speeding up permutations generation |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.19 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.122.1425662054.21433.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 23 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1425662054 news.xs4all.nl 2891 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35404 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:87047 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Abhiram R <abhi.darkness@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> A list of 100 elements has approximately 9.33 x 10**157 permutations. >> If you could somehow generate one permutation every yoctosecond, >> exhausting them would still take more than a hundred orders of >> magnitude longer than the age of the universe. >> -- >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > > True that :D I may have exaggerated on the number. Let's consider something > more practically manageable => 50 elements with a 50! permutation. > Is there a solution now? That's still infeasible, as others have pointed out. At one permutation every picosecond, you'll still need 9.6 x 10**44 years. If the size isn't that important to you and you just want a faster implementation of permutations, you could try reimplementing it yourself as a C extension. The stdlib implementation is already written in C though, so unless you have a better algorithm I doubt you'll find much room for optimization.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Speeding up permutations generation Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 10:13 -0700
csiph-web