Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #104652

Re: hasattr() or "x in y"?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: hasattr() or "x in y"?
Date Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:05:25 +0000
Lines 24
Message-ID <mailman.12.1457733974.12893.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <nbve7c$nbo$1@dont-email.me> <nbvep7$pb3$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de g32TcoHHklBjjccqH8+6dw5VOo/eWH0TzKdOn/fi5pWQ==
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.013
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '"in"': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'better:': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'originally': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'fri,': 0.27; "we're": 0.30; 'another': 0.32; 'language.': 0.32; 'point': 0.33; 'class': 0.33; 'view,': 0.33; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; "won't": 0.38; 'mean': 0.38; 'or,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'back': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'our': 0.64; 'mar': 0.65; 'smith': 0.76; 'dict,': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 80.234.129.0
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In-Reply-To <nbvep7$pb3$1@dont-email.me>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:104652

Show key headers only | View raw


On 11/03/2016 21:53, Charles T. Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:44:27 +0000, Charles T. Smith wrote:
>
>>  From the performance point of view, which is better: - hasattr()
>> - x in y
>>
>> TIA
>> cts
>
>
> I just realized that "in" won't look back through the class hierarchy...
> that clearly makes them not interchangable, but given we're only
> interested in the current dict...
>

Dict, don't you mean collection?  Or, to put it another way, what 
exactly were you originally asking?

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

hasattr() or "x in y"? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 21:44 +0000
  Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:55 +1100
  Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 21:53 +0000
    Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 09:04 +1100
    Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-11 22:05 +0000
  Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 22:00 +0000
    Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? "Charles T. Smith" <cts.private.yahoo@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 22:18 +0000
      Re: hasattr() or "x in y"? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 22:30 +0000

csiph-web