Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #7208
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'arguments': 0.05; 'attributes': 0.05; 'exception,': 0.07; 'names.': 0.07; 'raised': 0.07; 'tue': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'attribute': 0.09; 'foo': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'subject:Function': 0.09; 'undefined': 0.09; 'output': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'exception': 0.12; 'debugging': 0.14; '"""this': 0.16; '...]': 0.16; 'baz': 0.16; 'docstring': 0.16; 'from:addr:yahoo.com.ar': 0.16; 'occurred.': 0.16; 'read:': 0.16; 'stack': 0.16; 'traceback': 0.16; '(most': 0.16; 'tue,': 0.17; 'occurred': 0.19; 'script.': 0.19; 'trace': 0.19; 'last):': 0.23; 'somehow': 0.23; '"this': 0.25; 'function': 0.25; 'modules': 0.26; 'object': 0.26; 'problem': 0.28; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'import': 0.29; 'instead': 0.29; 'module': 0.30; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.32; 'does': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'file': 0.34; 'example,': 0.35; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'similar': 0.37; 'despite': 0.37; 'sequence': 0.37; 'third-party': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'skip:s 20': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'header:Mime- Version:1': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'order': 0.62; 'here': 0.66; 'offer': 0.71; 'received:190': 0.74; '-0300,': 0.84; 'cgitb': 0.84; 'genellina': 0.84; 'gabriel': 0.91; 'subject:call': 0.91 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | "Gabriel Genellina" <gagsl-py2@yahoo.com.ar> |
| Subject | Re: Function call arguments in stack trace? |
| Date | Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:45:15 -0300 |
| References | <9d344c45-8017-4c80-9a17-bc7accd81047@l26g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | 190.2.4.25 |
| User-Agent | Opera Mail/11.11 (Win32) |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.12.1307500925.11593.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 117 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.94.164.166 |
| X-Trace | 1307500925 news.xs4all.nl 49180 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:48798 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7208 |
Show key headers only | View raw
En Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:09:54 -0300, Dun Peal <dunpealer@gmail.com>
escribió:
> In a stack trace, is it possible to somehow get the arguments with
> which each function was called?
>
> So for example, if function `foo` in module `bar` was called with
> arguments `(1, [2])` when it raised an exception, then instead of:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "bar.py", line 123, in foo
> build_rpms()
>
> The stack trace would read:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "bar.py", line 123, in foo(1, [2])
> build_rpms()
>
> This would save a lot of debugging time!
The cgitb module does exactly that; some third-party modules offer similar
functionality, but I don't remember any names.
Despite its name, cgitb works with any script.
Given this test script:
# begin test_traceback.py
import cgitb
cgitb.enable(format="text")
spam = []
def a(x, y):
"This is function a"
z = x+y
return b(z)
def b(z, n=3):
"""This is function b.
Its docstring is longer."""
if n!=3:
just(to_consume_space)
w = c(foo=z*n)
return w
def c(foo=0, bar=1):
"This is function c"
baz = foo+bar
spam.somenamethatdoesnotexist(foo+bar)
anotherglobal("thatdoesnotexisteither")
a(10, 20)
# end test_traceback.py
the output is:
AttributeError
Python 3.2: d:\apps\Python32\python.exe
Tue Jun 7 23:36:36 2011
A problem occurred in a Python script. Here is the sequence of
function calls leading up to the error, in the order they occurred.
D:\TEMP\test_traceback.py in <module>()
27 baz = foo+bar
28 spam.somenamethatdoesnotexist(foo+bar)
29 anotherglobal("thatdoesnotexisteither")
30
31 a(10, 20)
a = <function a>
D:\TEMP\test_traceback.py in a(x=10, y=20)
7 "This is function a"
8 z = x+y
9 return b(z)
10
11
global b = <function b>
z = 30
D:\TEMP\test_traceback.py in b(z=30, n=3)
18 just(to_consume_space)
19
20 w = c(foo=z*n)
21
22 return w
w undefined
global c = <function c>
foo undefined
z = 30
n = 3
D:\TEMP\test_traceback.py in c(foo=90, bar=1)
26 "This is function c"
27 baz = foo+bar
28 spam.somenamethatdoesnotexist(foo+bar)
29 anotherglobal("thatdoesnotexisteither")
30
global spam = []
spam.somenamethatdoesnotexist undefined
foo = 90
bar = 1
AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'somenamethatdoesnotexist'
[... exception attributes ...]
[... original traceback ...]
--
Gabriel Genellina
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Function call arguments in stack trace? Dun Peal <dunpealer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 11:09 -0700
Re: Function call arguments in stack trace? Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-06-07 18:23 +0000
Re: Function call arguments in stack trace? Dun Peal <dunpealer@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 12:31 -0700
Re: Function call arguments in stack trace? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-07 13:52 -0600
Re: Function call arguments in stack trace? Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-07 22:01 +0200
Re: Function call arguments in stack trace? Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-06-07 20:29 +0000
Re: Function call arguments in stack trace? "Gabriel Genellina" <gagsl-py2@yahoo.com.ar> - 2011-06-07 23:45 -0300
csiph-web