Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #22421
| References | <CAPTjJmoEuHcUs5vkTNywfC6ZAwsKdVvs+8os40EJ4Oa1GPaBVw@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-31 21:13 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Number of languages known [was Re: Python is readable] - somewhat OT |
| From | Tim Rowe <digitig@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1183.1333224843.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 22 March 2012 19:14, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > In any case, though, I agree that there's a lot of people > professionally writing code who would know about the 3-4 that you say. > I'm just not sure that they're any good at coding, even in those few > languages. All the best people I've ever known have had experience > with quite a lot of languages. I know 10 languages. But I'm not telling you what base that number is :) -- Tim Rowe
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Number of languages known [was Re: Python is readable] - somewhat OT Tim Rowe <digitig@gmail.com> - 2012-03-31 21:13 +0100
Re: Number of languages known [was Re: Python is readable] - somewhat OT Steve Howell <showell30@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-31 13:23 -0700
Re: Number of languages known [was Re: Python is readable] - somewhat OT Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-04-03 07:52 +1000
csiph-web