Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #110803

Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Random832 <random832@fastmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense?
Date Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:14 -0400
Lines 23
Message-ID <mailman.118.1467259216.2358.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <CAGtOLTe8VOnW6zbQSpoCwLL8Hj=cvF6wZ7wx-gxO=9-bQQ0fMw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.101.1467194475.2358.python-list@python.org> <57746765$0$1593$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmqAmesf58J9bYa7_vWXTtjnFU7JrkGy5hoqFNC3tTx-8Q@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.116.1467250108.2358.python-list@python.org> <b014e209-b2a6-4921-9e22-8473f7e50e21@googlegroups.com> <1467259214.2526352.652676097.71C0BE44@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de B2rZslP0Z/T/+5n6C8NAKAeYWv2n2OXnPpr3CuHSdWug==
Return-Path <random832@fastmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.007
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; "ain't": 0.09; 'received:internal': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'valueerror': 0.09; 'wed,': 0.15; 'value.': 0.15; 'bug).': 0.16; 'integer.': 0.16; 'message-id:@webmail.messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:10.202': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2.212': 0.16; 'received:66.111': 0.16; 'received:66.111.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:break': 0.16; 'subject:make': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'case.': 0.18; 'windows': 0.20; 'doc': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; '(which': 0.26; 'rest': 0.26; '(it': 0.29; 'windows,': 0.29; 'subject:/': 0.30; 'url:python': 0.33; 'raised': 0.33; 'equal': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'url:org': 0.36; 'subject:" ': 0.36; 'url:library': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'received:10': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'missing': 0.37; 'received:66': 0.38; 'anything': 0.38; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'url:3': 0.60; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'subject:any': 0.84; 'subject:else': 0.84; 'subject:sense': 0.84; 'hardest': 0.91; 'interesting,': 0.93
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=AevcId0EZR5thBC/hcvcRDjrpGE=; b=UhTiY0 b9sUKuo2SjJfyigsT1vq8+4hCo+YGc+6B57kX3AZ0j4X9o/si2vV/Og1Gxf6FloR 2jlyuHhgNfqVXudKM4m98RLvMHj/xo918+HUXFvQWLH1hY05ER1IhyOt9xPR1ff9 wtNRa79q+wNTH90uJVSoLMbwkkmHedBcyqyv8=
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=AevcId0EZR5thBC /hcvcRDjrpGE=; b=BHX2zPJ/KCMfa5zQcHVnjpxyEVUpQ3fh30DnlwjiZuC7hqt xOJxt7lDDEOrKiiJpSLcqkkA7zsEskwwWCNVzb8TzmS8gVjNFlr8HXC2L82+tAr3 IonR2dZIm6exvfZtmxE0iVoqC9si5At5KG3f2vXxKeJoBDN1J1wuVBIvMu/o=
X-Sasl-Enc uHUPFFwFxnBNNjInaNZ/pSEdSsZpR3DtxF9InXxcPI2D 1467259214
X-Mailer MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-03c7c087
In-Reply-To <b014e209-b2a6-4921-9e22-8473f7e50e21@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <1467259214.2526352.652676097.71C0BE44@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <CAGtOLTe8VOnW6zbQSpoCwLL8Hj=cvF6wZ7wx-gxO=9-bQQ0fMw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.101.1467194475.2358.python-list@python.org> <57746765$0$1593$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmqAmesf58J9bYa7_vWXTtjnFU7JrkGy5hoqFNC3tTx-8Q@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.116.1467250108.2358.python-list@python.org> <b014e209-b2a6-4921-9e22-8473f7e50e21@googlegroups.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:110803

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016, at 22:26, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > os.kill(os.getpid(), 9)
> >
> > Now THAT is the hardest way to abort. You ain't comin' back from
> > this one!
>
> Is it?
>
> | On Windows, signal() can only be called with SIGABRT, SIGFPE,
> | SIGILL, SIGINT, SIGSEGV, or SIGTERM. A ValueError will be raised in
> | any other case.

And SIGBREAK (it being missing from this list is a doc bug).

> from https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/signal.html
>
> 9 may still work?? Dunno...

That's signal, not kill. You can call kill on Windows with any
integer. Only CTRL_C_EVENT and CTRL_BREAK_EVENT (which aren't, AIUI,
equal to SIGINT and SIGBREAK, which is unfortunate for cross-platform
code) do anything interesting, the rest call TerminateProcess with the
given value.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Victor Savu <victor.nicolae.savu@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 10:01 +0000
  Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-30 10:27 +1000
    Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 11:28 +1000
      Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 19:26 -0700
        Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-30 00:00 -0400
      Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-30 14:12 +1000
        Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 14:40 +1000
        Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 23:47 -0500
        Re: "for/while ... break(by any means) ... else" make sense? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-30 00:59 -0400

csiph-web