Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #102288

Re: Cannot step through asynchronous iterator manually

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Frank Millman <frank@chagford.com> wrote:
> We had a recent discussion about the best way to do this, and ChrisA
> suggested the following, which I liked -
>
>    cur.execute('SELECT ...)
>    try:
>        row = next(cur)
>    except StopIteration:
>        # row does not exist
>    else:
>        try:
>            next_row = next(cur)
>        except StopIteration:
>            # row does exist
>        else:
>            # raise exception
>
> Now that I have gone async, I want to do the same with an asynchronous
> iterator.

Here's a crazy option. (Assuming that a row can't be None. If not, use
a unique sentinel object.)

cur.execute(whatever)
have_row = None
async for row in cur:
    if have_row is not None:
        raise TooManyRows
    have_row = row
if have_row is None:
    raise NoRowFound

It's kinda abusing the loop construct, but it'd work. Alternatively,
you could call the dunder method directly, but that feels dirty.
Dunders are for defining, not calling.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Cannot step through asynchronous iterator manually Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 19:27 +1100

csiph-web