Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74425
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Do I need to call close on the handle returned by urlopen? |
| Date | 2014-07-14 16:20 +0100 |
| References | <lq0sar$r6e$1@mx1.internetia.pl> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11799.1405351227.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 14/07/2014 15:59, krzysztof.zelechowski@syncron.com wrote: > The tutorial says that I should use "with open" to close the file handle > properly. The reference documentation for urlopen mentions that the handle > returned is like a file handle but the code samples below do not bother to > close the handle at all. Isn’t it inconsistent? Yes it is. The latter probably hasn't been updated after the introduction of the 'with' keyword and context managers. Would you like to click on the "Report a bug" link on the page in question and suggest a change? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Do I need to call close on the handle returned by urlopen? <krzysztof.zelechowski@syncron.com> - 2014-07-14 16:59 +0200 Re: Do I need to call close on the handle returned by urlopen? <krzysztof.zelechowski@syncron.com> - 2014-07-14 17:08 +0200 Re: Do I need to call close on the handle returned by urlopen? Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-07-14 10:09 -0500 Re: Do I need to call close on the handle returned by urlopen? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-07-14 16:20 +0100
csiph-web