Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29853
| From | Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | RE: Fastest web framework |
| Date | 2012-09-23 22:48 +0300 |
| References | <CA+vVgJWuy-QDhO4Zf4cvWqjeh4vd+4yjSUFDtQbGV4RZ2CMLXQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1152.1348429787.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy > <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> wrote: > > > > I have run recently a benchmark of a trivial 'hello world' application for various python web frameworks (bottle, django, flask, pyramid, web.py, wheezy.web) hosted in uWSGI/cpython2.7 and gunicorn/pypy1.9 > > There are other considerations that must be made when running a 'hello world'. > > -It is a basic string, but no numerical benchmarks. The basic string in return was chosen to benchmark framework code in processing a simple thing and measure the overhead related. In other words how effective the framework is inside. > -You've overlooked the fact that different OS's have other processes > at work, which need to be looked at > -and a function which performed several tasks(a string, and > numerical), and then returned the result on seveal operating systems, > with non-essential processes turned off There were minimal processes running on both client and server, and even if some have had CPU/network activity it was not so important to the workload both client and server experienced due to test performed. Hope I understood you correctly. Thanks. Andriy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: Fastest web framework Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornatskyy@live.com> - 2012-09-23 22:48 +0300
csiph-web